Deficiency Index

Protection Valley Manor

Protection, Kansas · CCN 17E034

15 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
94
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
4
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Comanche · rural
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 1, 2025

496 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.004.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover23.5%43.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ110.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD660.0%E220.0%F110.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 94 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6251×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Protection Valley Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 1, 2025

    The facility reported a census of 41 residents with one resident sampled for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure operational door locks, alarms, and supervision for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1, a resident at high risk for elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) to prevent an elopement. On 06/04/25 at 07:29 PM, R1 exited the facility without staff knowledge or supervision through an unlocked front door. The door was typically locked but the door lock override was implemented, leaving the door unsecured and the alarm disabled. An off-duty staff member observed R1 walking outside, approximately two blocks away from the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 16, 2023

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation, storage and serving to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - The initial environmental tour of the kitchen, on [DATE] at 08:02 AM with Dietary Staff BB, revealed the following items/areas of concerns: 1. The ice machine lacked a two-inch air gap between the drainpipe and the municipal discharge drain. 2. There were 12 stacks of dishes, each approximately 16 inches high, stored on the bottom shelf of a wire rack, approximately eight to 10 inches from the floor, with eating surfaces exposed. The stacks of dishes lacked a covering to protect them from dust or other contamination. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 5, 2025

    The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 03/03/25 at 10:44 AM during an initial tour of the main kitchen, refrigerator and dry food storage areas with Dietary Manager DD, the following areas of concern were observed: One unsealed/open box of outshine popsicles with an expiration date of 5/31/24 in snack freezer. One ten pound-bag of hamburger dethawing dated 2/23/24 in walk in freezer. On 03/03/25 at 10:36 AM, an interview with Dietary Manager DD revealed she expected staff to label, and date opened food items. Dietary Manager DD confrimed the concerns. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 30, 2021

    The facility census totaled 39 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents with a safe environment by the failure to secure dangerous chemicals in a locked place, inaccessible to the eight cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents living in the facility. Findings included: - Observation on 08/24/21 at 01:59 PM of the unlocked and open public bathroom, accessible to all residents, revealed a container on the counter identified as Di-Cide Ultra Wipes. Upon closer inspection, the Di-Cide Ultra Wipes container label noted to Keep Out of Reach of Children with warnings the wipes could cause severe eye injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 5, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. The facility identified residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the EBP residents were identified for staff and visitors. Further the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes and to follow infections for trends. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 03/03/25 at 11:02 AM, observation of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA O provided care for Resident (R) 8. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 94 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 5, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jun 17, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Nov 6, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2017Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Oct 7, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 2, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jun 10, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Feb 19, 2013—9 findings
  • Oct 31, 2011—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 15, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 9, 2010—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction