Prescott Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation
Prescott Valley, Arizona · CCN 035244
16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 102
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
- County
- Yavapai
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 24 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Arizona.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.95 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.3% | 48.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,278 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3370.2% | E1225.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5522×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Prescott Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 11, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, review of clinical record, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision consistent with the resident's needs was provided to one resident (#3) to prevent an accident of spilling a hot liquid beverage. The deficient practice resulted in the resident sustaining a burn.-Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the facility May 31, 2025, with diagnoses of encephalopathy, attention and concentration deficit, cognitive communication deficit, frontal lobe and executive function deficit, weakness, and Alzheimer's disease.A brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment.The General Progress note dated May 31, 2025, revealed Resident #3… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Aug 19, 2025
Number of residents sampled: 21Number of residents cited: 17The facility failed to ensure residents right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her medical recordsBased on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to protect residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. The deficient practice could result in an unauthorized access to residents' personal and medical records.Findings include:During a medication administration observation task on August 19, 2025 starting at 4:09 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Staff #94, Staff #94 administered Hydromorphone 4 MG (milligram) two tablets by mouth as ordered for pain for Resident #67. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 19, 2025
Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to provide a written notice notifying one resident (#71 and #73) upon transfer to an acute care hospital setting of the bed hold which specifies the duration of bed-hold including reserve payment, and the facility failed to send notification of transfer of discharged residents to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #71: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #71 Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.0, cognitively intact. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645Aug 19, 2025
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 7 residents (#1, #7, #49, #2, #25 and #18 were) with diagnosis of serious mental illness were referred for PASARR (Pre-admission and Resident Review) Level II evaluation. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the services according to their assessed needs.Findings include: -Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. The PASARR Level I screening dated April 29, 2025 revealed that the resident met the criteria for 30 day Convalescent Care. SMI (serious mental illness) included schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 19, 2025
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered following the parameter set for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#2 and #52). The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving the appropriate treatment they need. Findings include:-Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild dementia with other behavioral disturbance, age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, major depressive disorder and low back pain.A physician orders dated April 28, 2025 included for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (opioid) 5-325 mg 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours PRN for pain 6/10 not to exceed 3 grams/24 hours and pain assessment every shift using PAINAD (Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia) or… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 102 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 19, 2025Standard and complaint17 findings
- Jul 11, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2023Standard3 findings
- Sep 9, 2022Standard and complaint12 findings
- Apr 2, 2021Standard10 findings
- Jan 6, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Feb 21, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 15, 2017Standard2 findings
- Nov 18, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
- Aug 21, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jun 12, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2013—8 findings
- Dec 22, 2011—5 findings
- Nov 19, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction