Deficiency Index

Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina-Summerv

Summerville, South Carolina · CCN 425389

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
76
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
48
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA
County
Dorchester
Medicare-certified since
2009

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 26, 2025

440 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.625.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover52.4%42.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD150.0%E—F150.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 76 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina-Summerv, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 26, 2025

    Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 Main Kitchen and 1of 1 Satellite Kitchen. Additionally, 3 out of 5 dietary staff were observed without the use of proper hair restraints, while in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) copyright 2020, revealed the following: Guideline: Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area free from contaminants. Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level and food safety. Under Procedure it states, 1. General storage guidelines to be followed: a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 26, 2025

    Based on review of the facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed. Specifically, Enhanced-Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not followed for Resident (R)2, who was observed receiving care while on EBP. The facility further failed to ensure oral medications were not touched using bare hands during a random observation while on the unit for 1 of 1 residents receiving oral medications during the random observation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, reviewed and revised on 04/01/2024, states, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jun 2, 2022

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review,and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)1 out of 3 residents reviewed for wandering/elopement was provided adequate supervision. Specifically, R1 was able to exit out of a window in his room without staff knowledge. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Wander/Elopement Risk Precautions revealed- 2. The following actions will be implemented for residents with a Wander Risk Assessment: a. 0-6 Reassessment as per policy b. 7-10 Initiate Wander Monitoring Log to further assess risk c. 11 or > Initiate Wander Monitoring Log to assess wandering patterns and initiate care conference to consider further measures 3. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 76 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 1, 2018Standard20 findings
  • Feb 16, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Aug 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jul 1, 2015Standard4 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • May 8, 2014Standard14 findings
  • Jun 12, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 8, 2012—9 findings
  • Oct 18, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction