Pleasant Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Waxahachie, Texas · CCN 675889
28 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 99
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 9
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 132
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Ellis
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Apr 10, 2026
213 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.31 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.7% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $29,011 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J26.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1758.6% | E931.0% | F13.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pleasant Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 14, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation; the facility failed to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to: 1. ensure Resident #1 was evaluated and treated for urinary retention which led to Resident #1 requiring emptying of her bladder in the emergency department on 01/27/24 2. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF697Feb 14, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to: 1. ensure Resident #1's prescribed oxycodone was in the facility and provided to Resident #1 for her pain from bilateral broken ankles and surgery An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 01/31/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 15, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all food items were sealed and properly covered. CK H failed to wash and sanitize the food processor in between uses. DA I failed to wash her hands after handling trash and prior to beginning a food preparation activity. The Dietary Supervisor failed to ensure the dish machine was operating at the proper temperature for ware washing. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: Observations of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator on 11/13/2023 from 9:02 a.m. through 9:04 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Apr 10, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for two sampled residents (R50 and R8) reviewed for menus, in that: The facility failed to utilize therapeutic menu extensions for carbohydrate-controlled diets for R50 and R8. The facility failed to follow portion sizes for all diets for two days. These failures had the potential to affect resident's dependent on the facility kitchen for their nutrients as well as 22 residents who had ordered carbohydrate-controlled (CC) diet, placing them at risk of spikes or drops in blood glucose levels and/or weight loss or weight gain Findings included: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Mar 5, 2026
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #13) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care and change in conditions.The facility failed to obtain daily weights for Resident #13 for the dates of 2/2/26, 2/3/26, 2/4/26, 2/5/26, 2/7/26, 2/8/26, 2/9/26, 2/10/26, 2/11/26, 2/12/26, 2/13/26, 2/14/26, 2/16/26, 2/17/26, 2/18/26, 2/19/26, 2/21/26, 2/22/26, 2/23/26, 2/24/26, 2/28/26, 3/1/26, and 3/3/26.These failures placed residents at risk of weight gain, disease exacerbation, shortness of breath, decreased quality of life, heart problems, such as arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat).Findings… […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 99 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 10, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 5, 2026Standard11 findings
- Jan 10, 2025Standard8 findings
- Feb 14, 2024Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 15, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Sep 15, 2022Standard3 findings
- Dec 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2021Standard3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Jan 16, 2020Complaint2 findings
- May 24, 2019Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 5, 2019Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2018Complaint2 findings
- May 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 6, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jul 26, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jul 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 11, 2015Standard4 findings
- Dec 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 20, 2014Standard7 findings · 4 harm
- Jul 11, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 22, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 16, 2012—5 findings
- Jan 6, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 23, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction