Windsor Gardens
Lancaster, Texas · CCN 455832
29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 61
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 150
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CANTEX CONTINUING CARE
- County
- Dallas
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 20, 2026
112 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.43 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.37 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 55.5% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,877 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J27.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1553.6% | E1139.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6552×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Windsor Gardens, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Jun 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed Resident #1's comprehensive care plan to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers. The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed Resident #1's comprehensive care plan which required two-person shower assists, which caused Resident #1 to fall from the shower bed and sustained a frontal scalp hematoma and laceration on her forehead which required 3 stitches. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transferred by two people using a mechanical lift as indicated in the comprehensive care plan. The facility failed to ensure two people assisted Resident #1 during showers as indicated in the comprehensive care plan. Resident #1 fell from the shower bed and sustained a frontal scalp hematoma and laceration on her forehead which required 3 stitches. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jul 20, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for two (Residents #1 and #2) of eight residents reviewed for resident rights. A) 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately dressed, on Monday 07/20/26 at 9:35 am. He was sitting in a wheelchair with only a blue hospital gown on, at the north end of the 600 hall. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately dressed, on Monday 07/20/26 at 10:39 am. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Jan 15, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #7, Resident #98, and Resident #104) of twenty-one residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #7, Resident #98, and Resident #104's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the resident on 01/13/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: Resident #98Review of Resident #98's Face Sheet, dated 01/14/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Jan 15, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for eleven (Residents #2, #5, #33, #40, #44, #49, #53, #91, #100, #116, and #117) of twenty-eight residents reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN B secured Resident #5's medical information before leaving her cart on 01/13/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure MA C secured Residents #2, #33, #40, #44, #49, #53, #91, #100, #116, and #117's medical information before leaving her cart on 01/14/2026.These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal and medical information confidential and exposed to unauthorized individuals.Findings included: 1. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 61 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 15, 2026Standard9 findings
- Dec 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 23, 2025Complaint3 findings
- May 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 7, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Jun 22, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 5, 2023Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jul 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 17, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jul 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 31, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2019Standard2 findings
- Nov 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2018Complaint3 findings
- May 5, 2017Standard1 finding
- Apr 24, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 25, 2011—5 findings
- Jan 7, 2011—4 findings
- Dec 22, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction