Deficiency Index

Pinehurst Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Pinehurst, North Carolina · CCN 345370

26 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
16
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
144
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING
County
Moore
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover56.1%52.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,620 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1270.6%E211.8%F15.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B15.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 17 of the 149 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pinehurst Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 24, 2025

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews with staff and the Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #72). On 8/26/24 Resident #72 slid out of the bed to the floor while care was being provided by Nurse Aide (NA) #9. The incident resulted in a cut and swelling to the left eyelid. Resident #72 was sent to the emergency department (ED) and required 3 dissolvable sutures to close the wound over his left eye. On 1/12/25 Resident #72 was placed on his side during incontinence care by NA #3 and fell off the bed hitting his head on the side table when the NA reached for cream. Resident #72 was sent to the ED and required sutures to repair a laceration on his left upper eyelid. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 26, 2022

    Based on observations, resident, staff and Medical Director (MD) interviews, the facility failed to provide wound care in a safe manner that resulted in a resident fall with injury. Resident #54 fell during wound care and sustained a distal femur fracture. In addition, the facility failed to complete an investigation for Resident #54's fall. The facility also failed to lift a non-ambulatory resident with a mechanical sling lift according to the manufacturer instructions resulting in a distal femur fracture (Resident #3). This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: 1. Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with [CONDITION(S)] and a history of a left knee arthroplasty (knee replacement). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF726May 26, 2022

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence 2 of 2 agency nursing assistants (NA's) (NA #9 and NA #10) were trained on the safe use of the facility's mechanical sling lift resulting in a distal femur fracture (Resident #3). This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]/20 with dementia and [CONDITION(S)]. Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE] indicated severe cognitive impairment, non-ambulatory and total staff assistance of 2 with transfers. Resident #3's revised care planned for a risk of falls dated 8/5/21 read she was a mechanical sling transfer with the assistance of 2 staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 27, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a walk-in cooler that was clean and in good repair for 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and failed to store food off the floor in the walk-in cooler. These practices had the potential to affect food served to 100 of 104 residents. The findings included: 1. An observation of the walk-in cooler on 3/26/24 at 11:31 am revealed a black and brown substance on the walls in the form of drip marks that appeared to be dry. There was also dust buildup on the ceiling of the walk-in cooler and to the vents in the walk-in cooler. A vent that contained 3 fans had dust build up. When the ceiling was touched the hanging dust was observed to fall to the cooler floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 30, 2026

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, date, and seal leftover food stored ready for use in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator, 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator. This practice had the potential to affect food served to residents.The findings included: a. Accompanied by Dietary Aide #1, an observation was made of the walk-in refrigerator on 4/27/26 at 6:30 AM. An undated piping bag, partially filled with whipped topping, was sitting on the shelf of the walk-in refrigerator. Dietary Aide #1 stated the whipped topping was likely used on desserts from the previous day. b. […]

Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • May 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
  • May 26, 2022Standard17 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 13, 2021Complaint6 findings
  • May 11, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Feb 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2020Standard15 findings
  • Jul 12, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 10, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 20, 2018Standard15 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 17, 2018Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 21, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Jun 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard15 findings
  • Jan 27, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 13, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Sep 12, 2013—5 findings
  • Jul 12, 2012—12 findings · 1 harm
  • May 26, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction