Deficiency Index

Piedmont Hills Center for Nursing and Rehab

Greensboro, North Carolina · CCN 345116

28 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
155
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
12
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy12

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
126
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ALLIANCE HEALTH GROUP
County
Guilford
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Oct 23, 2025

382 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.243.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.25—
Annual nurse turnover47.3%49.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$217,827 across 5 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ35.8%K23.8%L—
Actual harmG23.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2650.0%E1019.2%F35.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B47.7%C23.8%
CMS’s current file: 52 of the 155 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6382×

    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Piedmont Hills Center for Nursing and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF726Jul 17, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to verify competency for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers according to the manufacturer's instructions. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same shared glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. MA #1 was interviewed and reported she worked at the facility for approximately 2 years and her competencies for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers per the manufacturer's instructions had never been verified. She stated she never cleaned and disinfected the glucometer between residents. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jul 17, 2024

    Based on record reviews, observations, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility staff failed to disinfect a shared blood glucose meter (glucometer) between residents whose blood glucose levels required monitoring. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. This occurred while there were no residents with known bloodborne pathogens, such as Hepatitis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), in the facility. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Aug 19, 2022

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, Physician Assistant and the Medical Director, the facility failed to implement an order from the hospital discharge summary to test blood sugar twice daily for Resident #72. The facility administered injectable and oral diabetes medication to Resident #72 who was diagnosed with diabetes without monitoring the resident's blood sugar from admission to the facility until admission to the hospital. On 8/13/22, Resident #72's blood sugar registered HI on the glucometer. Resident #72 was sent to the emergency department (ED) due to being lethargic and staff were unable to obtain vital signs. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF756Aug 19, 2022

    Based on record review, Consultant Pharmacist, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete an evaluation of Resident #72's medication regimen that identified the need to monitor injectable and oral diabetes medications for 4 of 4 medication regimen reviews. Resident #72 received weekly injectable and daily oral diabetes medication without blood sugar testing as ordered and experienced critically high blood sugars identified at the hospital. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Resident #72). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 11, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and staff, Medical Director and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to ensure the necessary supervision was provided to a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent an avoidable accident. Resident #1 was prescribed a puree diet and had a history of choking. On 3/19/25 Resident #1, who was known to have poor safety awareness, had a choking episode in the main lobby. Staff performed a back blow that produced a piece of bread from his mouth. He was assessed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and determined to return to his baseline. Following the 3/19/25 choking incident, all facility staff were educated on the importance of providing residents with diets per the physician order. […]

Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 155 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 23, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 10, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jul 17, 2024Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 4, 2023Standard and complaint32 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 23, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Dec 13, 2021Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 5, 2021Complaint12 findings
  • Nov 1, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 19, 2018Standard9 findings
  • May 30, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 14, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
  • May 24, 2017Complaint8 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard2 findings
  • May 6, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 28, 2014Standard3 findings
  • May 24, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2012—4 findings
  • Jun 22, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 18, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction