Piedmont Crossing
Thomasville, North Carolina · CCN 345310
12 surveys since 2012, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 33
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 104
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Davidson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 14, 2025
633 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.11 | 4.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.88 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.6% | 41.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D133.3% | E133.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B133.3% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Piedmont Crossing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 13, 2023
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, date, and/or remove expired food items stored for use in 1 of 1 reach-in prep coolers, 1 of 1 reach-in storage coolers and 1 of 1 walk-in freezer units. The facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination when soiled dishware was stored on a shelf designated for clean dishware and failed to ensure plastic storage containers were dry before stacking. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on [DATE] at 11:27 am through 12:05 pm, the Director of Dining Service was present during the inspection, the following was observed: a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Sep 9, 2022
Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide any scheduled activities on the weekends. This was for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #22 and Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for activities. The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #1 activities care plan initiated 6/21/21 read she participated in group activities and individual pursuits. Her quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE] indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #1's Social assessment dated [DATE] indicated she participated in the assessment and she was cognitively intact. She enjoyed individual pursuits such as needlework, social media and watching television. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Oct 7, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain physician's order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The findings included: 1. Resident #214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Record review revealed no physician's order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Further review of the EMR revealed a MOST (Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment) form dated 9/21/21 signed by the nurse practitioner and Resident #214 ' s family member that indicated DNR. A history and physical dated 9/24//21 revealed Resident #214 had a MOST form in place dated 9/24/21 that indicated DNR. On 10/5/21 at 11:56 AM, an interview was conducted with Nurse Supervisor #1. She stated code status is displayed in the EMR on the main page. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF626Feb 14, 2025
Based on record review, Resident Representative (RR), Hospital Case Manager, Hospice Hospital Liaison, Ombudsman and staff interviews, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after being transferred to the hospital for evaluation due to a resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for discharge (Resident #224). The findings included: Resident #224 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under hospice care with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia with mood disturbance, and dementia with agitation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Sep 9, 2022
Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure alternating pressure reducing mattresses were set according to the residents' weight for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident #62, and Resident #14). The findings included: 1. Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for activities of daily living and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was coded with one stage 2 pressure injury during the assessment period. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 33 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 14, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
- Oct 13, 2023Standard1 finding
- Sep 9, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
- Oct 7, 2021Standard1 finding
- Aug 22, 2019Standard2 findings
- Jul 25, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jun 16, 2016Standard4 findings
- Apr 21, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jul 9, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 21, 2014Standard5 findings
- May 23, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction