Pico Rivera Healthcare Center
Pico Rivera, California · CCN 055170
25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 175
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1980
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 9, 2026
214 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.83 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.34 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.8% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $26,588 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3981.3% | E612.5% | F24.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6954×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7593×
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5832×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pico Rivera Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Jan 11, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 95) by failing to: a. Notify the physician of a change of condition (COC) when Resident 95's blood sugar level (measure of glucose [sugar] in the blood [normal range 70- 100 milligrams [mg, unit of measurement] per (/) deciliter [dl, unit of measurement] mg/dl) was elevated on [DATE]. b. Notify the physician when Resident 95 began to experience congestion (an abnormal or excessive accumulation of a body fluid), gurgling (a hollow bubbling sound), wheezing, and an episode of emesis (vomiting) on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 27, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), who was left alone during toilet use, by failing to: 1. Provide Resident 1 with assistance from staff during toileting. 2. Ensure Resident 1, who was on the superstar program for high risk for fall, was not left alone in the bathroom during toilet use. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an avoidable fall on 9/25/2022, with a subsequent transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for treatment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 9, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety practices and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices when the facility failed to:1. Maintain cold food items at safe temperatures when broccoli salads measured 66 to 68 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a scale of temperature).2. Ensure bowls of yogurt were properly immersed in an ice bath or stored to maintain acceptable temperatures of 40 F and below during tray line or pre-handling service.3. Ensure one box of beans and one box of lentils were adequately sealed and stored in the dry food storage area.4. Ensure one can of diced red peppers were labeled with the date received.5. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the kitchen staff failed to wash their hands prior to becoming in contact with food, failed to check food temperatures, and failed to store food under sanitary conditions when the following occurred: 1. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) did not wash their hands before checking food temperatures. 2. The refrigerator stored food without a use by date. 3. The refrigerator stored food that was spoiled. 4. The freezer stored food without the date that it was placed in the freezer and did not have a use by date. 5. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 4, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and hand hygiene practice in the kitchen when: 1. Ice machine ice deflector (inner plastic cover in the ice storage bin) and internal compartment were dirty. 2. Not all foods were dated when received and opened, and not all foods were labeled to indicate content. 3. Resident food trays were not air dried completely before stacking. 4. Visible dust build up on the vent above the steam table and the dishwashing area. 5. Egg salad made on 6/2/2021 in the walk-in refrigerator was not monitored for safe cool down process (hot food cooled down within a certain time frame to prevent harmful bacterial growth). 6. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 175 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 9, 2026Standard15 findings
- Mar 28, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2025Standard7 findings
- Jan 11, 2024Standard24 findings · 1 harm
- May 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 27, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 1, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Jun 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 17, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jun 4, 2021Standard12 findings
- Feb 5, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Aug 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 8, 2019Standard17 findings
- Sep 18, 2018Standard9 findings
- Oct 18, 2017Standard14 findings
- Oct 27, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2015Standard16 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 23, 2013—10 findings
- Jan 25, 2012—13 findings
- Nov 2, 2010—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction