Deficiency Index

Pettigrew Rehabilitation Center

Durham, North Carolina · CCN 345053

16 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
47
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
County
Durham
Medicare-certified since
1969

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.523.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.45—
Annual nurse turnover60.7%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1161.1%E422.2%F211.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B15.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 47 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pettigrew Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 19, 2022

    Based on record review, staff interviews, family interview, and physician interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from employee to resident abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Nurse Aide (NA) #7 mocked and intimidated Resident #1 when she refused his assistance and Resident #1 expressed NA #7 inappropriately touched her breast. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The care plan dated 1/25/22 revealed a focus area for impaired communication related to [CONDITION(S)]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 7, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to: 1) Maintain the chemical sanitizing solution of the dish machine at the correct concentration according to the manufacturer's recommendations; 2) Change gloves/wash hands between handling soiled and clean dishes to prevent cross-contamination of the clean dishes and failed to allow all clean dishware to air dry; 3) Dispose of expired food items and seal, label, and/or date opened food items observed in food storage areas; 4) Cover facial hair for 4 of 4 Dietary staff observed with facial hair and working in food preparation (Cook #1, [NAME] #2, Dietary Aide #1 and Dietary Aide #2); and 5) Keep the kitchen food service equipment and vents clean within the Dietary Department. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 9, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interviews and an interview with the service technician for the facility's dish machine, the facility failed to: 1) Maintain the chemical sanitizing solution of the dish machine at the correct concentration according to the manufacturer's recommendations during 1 of 1 observations of the dish washing process; 2) Failed to change gloves/wash hands between handling soiled and clean dishes to prevent cross-contamination of the clean dishes and failed to allow all clean dishware to air dry during 1 of 1 observations of the dish washing practices; and 3) Dispose of expired food items and seal, label, and/or date opened food items observed in food storage areas during 2 of 2 observations of the facility's food storage areas. The findings included: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 28, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to label leftovers and discard expired food from their walk- in refrigerator and failed to maintain the walk-in freezer in a safe operating condition. The kitchen's walk-in freezer had accumulated ice on the freezer floor. The facility failed to ensure the commercial dishwasher was maintaining wash and rinse temperatures according to the manufacturer's recommendations, failed to use clean lids to cover food on the steam table, failed to ensure the glasses and cups stacked on the drying rack were clean and failed to ensure the sanitization solution strength used on the kitchen counter tops was within manufacturer's recommendation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Mar 7, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews, manufacturer's literature review, the facility failed to date opened multi-dose vials of insulin medication in 2 of 5 medication administration carts (Long and Short halls), failed to discard expired insulin pens in 1 of 5 medication administration carts (Short hall) and discard loose pills in the medication cart drawers for 3 of 5 medication administration carts (Rehabilitation, Long and Short halls). Findings Included: a. On 3/3/25 at 10:00 AM, an observation of the medication administration cart of Rehabilitation Hall with Nurse #6 revealed in the second drawer of the medication cart, which contained over-the-counter medications, there were noted three white loose pills and two yellow round-shaped loose pills and one blue oval shape loose… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 47 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Mar 7, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2023Standard3 findings
  • May 19, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Apr 8, 2020Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Feb 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jun 15, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction