Pauls Valley Care Center
Pauls Valley, Oklahoma · CCN 375463
27 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 194
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 71
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Garvin · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 68 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Dec 18, 2025
326 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.87 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.23 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $50,778 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 2
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G16.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D853.3% | E640.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6271×
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6361×
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pauls Valley Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Jun 16, 2021
On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers (PU's), to consistently and thoroughly assess the resident's skin, and to notify the physician and intervene in a timely manner for the PU's. The resident did not have weekly skin assessments conducted and developed a stage II pressure ulcer to the left inner buttock. The resident later developed a pressure ulcer to the right upper buttock that progressed to a Stage IV. Both wounds joined each other creating an unstageable pressure ulcer due to necrosis, to the sacrum. An infection was identified in the wound. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF692Jun 16, 2021
On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess and intervene in a timely manner to prevent severe weight loss for three residents who had severe weight loss. Resident #10 developed three pressure ulcers. One progressed to a Stage IV, merged with another pressure ulcer and was unstageable due to necrotic tissue. The wound became infected. On [DATE] the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. At 2:30 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. At 5:16 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was provided. The plan of removal was updated on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 18, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from injuries resulting in a fracture for 1 (#3) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.The DON identified 36 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated diagnoses report for Resident #3's showed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of morbid obesity (severe) due to excessive calories.A comprehensive assessment for Resident #3, dated 04/12/25, showed the resident was dependent upon staff for all transfers.A care plan for Resident #3's, revised on 10/04/25, showed Resident #3 required a mechanical lift with two staff assistance for transfers.A Combined Initial and Final incident report, dated 06/04/25, read in part, 06/04/25 1330 [1:30 p.m.], staff was transferring… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF919Oct 11, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light system for 29 of 29 residents who were reviewed for an adequate call system. The administrator identified 29 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/07/21 at 12:50 p.m., call lights were checked in every room and neither lit up or sounded. Call lights in the bathrooms/shower rooms did not work. On 10/07/21 at 12:52 p.m., resident #6 reported the call lights had not worked for about a month. The resident reported the staff did not do room checks very often. On 10/07/21 at 1:05 p.m., resident #7 squeaked a toy and reported she also had a bell to call for assistance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Apr 18, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit quarterly reviews of the minimum data set in the required timeframe's for eight (#3, 7, 11, 12, 14,16, 17, and #23) of 10 residents whose clinical records were reviewed for completion/submission of the resident assessments. The administrator identified 34 residents. Census: 34 Findings: The facility's MDS Completion and Submission Timeframe's policy, dated 10/01/10, read in part our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with federal and state submission timeframe's . […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 194 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 18, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 18, 2024Standard6 findings
- Mar 10, 2023Standard4 findings
- Aug 18, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jun 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 21, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Jan 27, 2022Standard11 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Oct 11, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jun 16, 2021Infection control5 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 15, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Sep 17, 2020Infection control4 findings
- Mar 3, 2020Complaint6 findings
- Jul 2, 2019Standard and complaint26 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 2, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 23, 2018Standard11 findings
- Oct 17, 2017Standard and complaint21 findings
- Jul 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2016Standard20 findings · 1 harm
- May 19, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 29, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 3, 2016Complaint8 findings
- Sep 2, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jul 17, 2014Standard7 findings
- Oct 1, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 20, 2012Standard28 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 16, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction