Parkside Manor
Stuart, Nebraska · CCN 285245
12 surveys since 2013, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 38
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- Government - City
- Chain
- RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT
- County
- Holt · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 11, 2026
243 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.52 | 4.01 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.7% | 44.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D675.0% | E112.5% | F112.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Parkside Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 20, 2025
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 006.18(B) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to Covid 19 test 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 10, 11, 14, 17, 21, and 26) when respiratory illness symptoms were displayed and failed to implement isolation procedures for Resident 10 when respiratory symptoms were displayed. The facility failure had the potential to effect all residents in the building. The sample size was 6 and the census was 27. Findings are: A. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF606Mar 11, 2026
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete the required background checks for 2 or 5 sampled staff to protect residents from potential abuse. The facility census was 27. Findings are:A. Review of the undated facility policy Parkside Manor Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Resident Property revealed the following: -It was the policy of the facility to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification and verification of license and criminal background checks. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 7, 2022
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) according to facility policy and to wash hands and change gloves at to prevent cross contamination during the provision of care for Resident 12 and 19. The sample size was 21 and the facility census was 29. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy, Hand Hygiene revealed the following; -the objective was to prevent the spread of infection through adherence to good hand hygiene, -hand hygiene was a general term that applied to handwashing, antiseptic hand wash, antiseptic hand rub, or surgical hand antisepsis, and -all personnel should wash their hands with soap and water or use hand sanitizer products to… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF881Mar 11, 2026
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident 26's Antibiotic was ordered in Accordance with the facility Antibiotic Stewardship program. The facility census was 27. Findings are:A. Review of the undated facility Antibiotic Stewardship Policy revealed the following:-It was the policy of Parkside Manor to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) with the mission of promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics to treat infections and reduce possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use.-To meet the Antibiotic Stewardship guidelines, orders would include dose, duration, route and indication for Antibiotics prescribed for each resident and would be tracked and kept in the medical record. B. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 20, 2025
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's as needed antipsychotic (a type of medication which alters chemicals in the brain to effect changes in behavior, mood and emotion) medication was reviewed for continued need and renewed every 14 days as required. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 27. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Antipsychotic Drug Use Policy, last revised 10/10 revealed the following: -all residents having antipsychotic drug orders would have a proper diagnosis, -resident behaviors would be monitored daily, -the Pharmacy would routinely monitor and request appropriate dose reductions, -the facility would utilize the lowest effective dose based on behaviors,… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 11, 2026Standard2 findings
- Feb 20, 2025Standard3 findings
- Feb 1, 2024Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jul 15, 2021Standard2 findings
- Dec 4, 2019Standard1 finding
- Nov 6, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
- Aug 15, 2017Standard1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- May 26, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- May 7, 2015Standard4 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jan 30, 2013—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction