Deficiency Index

Fairview Manor

Fairmont, Nebraska · CCN 285206

13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
38
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
40
Ownership
Government - City/county
Chain
Independent
County
Fillmore · rural
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 3, 2024

767 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.134.01
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.69—
Annual nurse turnover16.3%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F133.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 38 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Fairview Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Aug 2, 2021

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to A) notify the physician of signs and symptoms related to a [CONDITION(S)] which resulted in delay of treatment and a hospitalization for 1 resident (Resident 1), B) notify the physician of a change in condition related to hypersensitivity to touch for 1 resident (Resident 1); and C) notify the physician of weight loss for 1 resident (Resident 1). The facility census was 37. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Oct 3, 2024

    License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(H)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the DS (Dietary Supervisor) had the required credentials. This had the potential to affect 38 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. The facility had a census of 38. Findings are: An interview on 9/30/24 at 12:25 PM with DS revealed [gender] had not taken classes for their CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) and that the administrator was going to set up the classes. An interview with the Administrator on 10/1/24 at 7:26 AM revealed DS was not a CDM and the RD was not currently employed full time at the facility. An interview with the RD on 10/1/24 at 10:00 AM revealed the RD works in the facility 8 hours a week and remotely to equal 25-30 total hours a week. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 25, 2022

    Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the transmission of COVID 19 by not ensuring that visitor screening was completed. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility identified a census of 36 at the time of survey. Findings are: A record review of an undated visitor screening log revealed there were blank entries. On 08/23/22 at 10:34 AM interview with the Medical Records Coordinator confirmed that the Medical Records Coordinator was to check the visitor screening sheets everyday while at work. The nurses check the sheets when visitors come in during the evening, on weekends and on holidays. When a visitor comes to visit the first time, they need to fill out a screening sheet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 25, 2022

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to monitor the temperatures for the medication refrigerator on the east hallway. This had the potential to affect any resident with medication which required refrigeration on the east hallway. The facility census was 36. Findings are: Observation of the east medication refrigerator on 8/24/2022 at 2:30 PM revealed multiple medications were being stored in the refrigerator including insulin. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Oct 3, 2024

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) assessment to reflect the resident's status for 1 (Resident 18) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 38. Findings are: A record review of Resident 18's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that Resident 18 was receiving clopidogrel (an antiplatelet medication used to prevent blood from forming a clot) 75 milligrams (mg) daily. A record review of Resident 18's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the use of antiplatelet medication was coded No. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 3, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Aug 25, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Aug 2, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 6, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 6, 2020Standard9 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Aug 23, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 14, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jul 1, 2013—2 findings
  • May 31, 2012—3 findings
  • May 19, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction