Deficiency Index

Park Regency Care Center

La Habra, California · CCN 555536

32 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
195
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DAVID JOHNSON
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.354.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover33.0%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4878.7%E69.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B711.5%C—
CMS’s current file: 61 of the 195 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Regency Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for four of five final sampled residents (Resident 8, 12, 38, and 55) reviewed for the use of the side rails. * The facility failed to obtain the physician's order, to provide the least restrictive alternatives, and to conduct a bed rail assessment for Resident 12's use of the side rails. * The facility failed to provide documented evidence the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bed rails were conducted for Resident 8, 38, and 55 bed rails. In addition, the facility failed to conduct a bed rail assessment for Resident 38's bed rails. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * Boxed food items in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer were observed placed within two to three inches from the ceiling, blocking the spray of the fire sprinklers. * A floor tile next to the facility's ice machine was observed missing a piece of the tile. * Station 2 Residents' refrigerator did not have a thermometer inside the freezer, and half-a-gallon ice cream was observed with ice build along the top outer edges of the ice cream's lid. * A ceiling tile inside the facility's dining room was observed with a hole in it. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented. * The facility failed to initiate an infection tracking surveillance for the residents with signs and symptoms of infection who were not prescribed with antibiotic treatment. * CNA 7 was observed with artificial nails, extending beyond her fingertips. * Resident 76's drape was observed with a black substance along the bottom of the drape. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the heavy-duty blenders used for puree preparation were air dried prior to storing. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses to the residents consuming the foods prepared in the facility's kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF909Oct 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete for 15 of 15 residents (14 final sampled residents, Residents 12, 13, 23, 33, 44, 47, 49, 77, 80, 83, 85, 87, 540, and 541 and one nonsampled resident, Resident 24) reviewed for side rail use. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 195 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2025Standard19 findings
  • Aug 27, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Oct 10, 2024Standard and complaint19 findings
  • Sep 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2022Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jun 9, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • May 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 25, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Sep 12, 2018Standard11 findings
  • May 14, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 12, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Aug 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 10, 2016Standard17 findings
  • Dec 24, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Jan 5, 2015Standard14 findings
  • Jan 10, 2014—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2012—16 findings
  • Aug 20, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 20, 2011—17 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction