Deficiency Index

Park Manor Rehabilitation CTR

Walla Walla, Washington · CCN 505074

30 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
76
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Walla Walla
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

May 15, 2026

178 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.334.01
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.23—
Annual nurse turnover30.4%41.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$28,106 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG114.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD342.9%E342.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 76 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Manor Rehabilitation CTR, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) assess for a change in condition related to increased shortness of breath and weakness for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 56), and 2) consistently follow physician orders to prevent constipation (unable to pass stool regularly, that eventually becomes hardened) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 71) both reviewed for quality of care. Resident 56 experienced harm when their bowels became impacted (when you're unable to regularly pass stool or feces and it backs up inside your colon), pain, and required a hospital intervention for relief. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was prepared in advance, followed, and reviewed by the facility's Registered Dietitian for three of three meals (noon meals on 03/27/2023, 03/28/2023, and 03/29/2023) observed during the survey. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs, weight gain or loss, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the week one menu cycle provided by the facility showed: Monday (03/27/2023) lunch: baked tenders (changed from baked drumsticks), corn pudding, green beans, and apple cobbler. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement key components of infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk for spread of infection, by failing to follow the manufacturer's instructions for use for disposal of single use face shields (a barrier worn from crown to chin that wraps around the face to the point of the ear that prevents infectious materials from entering the eye) for 11 of 11 Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) carts (a supply cart containing masks, gowns, gloves, and eye protection/face shields) inspected for PPE supply. There were five carts located outside of resident rooms and six carts located inside resident rooms. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607May 15, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy/procedures to identify, investigate, and report allegations of abuse/neglect for 5 of 8 residents (Residents 82, 71, 4, 33, and 77) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk of continued abuse/neglect, emotional distress, feeling unsafe, loss of dignity and unmet care needs. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, revised 10/2025, showed residents had the right to be free from abuse, including the failure to provide basic care/services, physical, verbal, and mental abuse. The policy showed all suspected allegations would be thoroughly and completely investigated and reported to the State Agency (SA). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804May 15, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature and in a timely manner for 6 of 9 residents (Residents 51, 19, 4, 55, 45 and 19) reviewed for food. This failure placed residents at risk for food-borne illness, dissatisfaction with meals, and inadequate nutritional intake. Findings included.Review of the Washington State Food Code, dated 03/01/2022, showed long-term care facilities must comply with the food code for temperature control, while meeting specific resident care requirements. Facilities must provide nourishing, palatable meals that were attractively served and adjusted to residents' preferences and needs. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 76 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 15, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2025Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Sep 1, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2021Standard11 findings
  • Jan 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Apr 3, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Aug 27, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 1, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 26, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 22, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jul 8, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 25, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 29, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Nov 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 14, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jan 8, 2014—1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2013—2 findings
  • May 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2013—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 17, 2012—2 findings
  • May 31, 2011—2 findings
  • Feb 25, 2011—1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction