Deficiency Index

Park Manor of Cyfair

Houston, Texas · CCN 675818

33 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
120
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
HMG HEALTHCARE
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 1, 2026

192 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.103.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover44.8%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD337.5%E562.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 120 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Manor of Cyfair, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care in that. -The facility nursing staff failed to obtain radiology results for Resident #1 after she received a radiology test ordered by her physician, leaving the resident in pain and discomfort for 2 days before action was taken. This failure could affect residents with a change of condition at risk for a delay of care or treatment, pain and suffering. Findings Included: Record review of Resident # 1's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF777Jun 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges for one of seven residents(Resident #1) reviewed for diagnostic services in that. - The facility did not timely report Resident #1's radiology findings of an acute [CONDITION(S)] to the ordering physician, resulting in a 2 day delay in treatment. This failure could place residents who required radiology services at risk for delayed identification and treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings Included: Record review of Resident # 1's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jun 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #19, Resident #47, and Resident #13) reviewed for residents' rights. The facility failed to keep Resident #19's and Resident #47's room free of trash. The facility failed to keep Resident #13's wall clean. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsanitary environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 6/6/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Apr 25, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #159 ) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to ensure that the 100 hall nursing cart did not contain expired insulin for Resident #42 - The facility failed to have Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen, a pain medication, available for administration to Resident #159 and failed to administer it according to physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Apr 25, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 15 percent based on 7 errors out of 44 opportunities, which involved 4 of 7 residents (Resident #37, Resident #159, Resident #16 and Resident #6) reviewed for medication errors. - LVN A failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #37 as ordered by attempting to administer HumaLOG Insulin (Insulin Lispro) outside of parameters instead of Basaglar Insulin as ordered. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 120 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jul 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Nov 11, 2020Standard11 findings
  • Oct 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jan 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jul 29, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 25, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Sep 12, 2014Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 27, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard17 findings
  • Jan 23, 2014—1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2013—7 findings
  • Oct 31, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2012—4 findings
  • Apr 27, 2012—11 findings
  • Mar 9, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2011—2 findings
  • Apr 15, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction