Park Anaheim Healthcare Center
Anaheim, California · CCN 555035
43 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 290
- Surveys
- 43
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 115
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Mar 25, 2026
229 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.82 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 20.2% | 37.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5683.6% | E811.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B34.5% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8805×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6954×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6933×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Park Anaheim Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the ice cream freezer was free from ice build-up. * The facility failed to ensure a hair restraint was worn by staff in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for the 62 out of 106 residents (census) who consumed food prepared in the kitchen.Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary infection control practices were maintained. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 14 changed PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and performed hand hygiene in between resident care for Residents 4 and 6 in an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) room. * The facility failed to ensure the Lint Trap Log was completed. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 performed hand hygiene in between provision of care for Residents 13 and 106. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 31's electric fan was clean and free of dusts. These failures placed the residents at risk for increased risk of infection and transmissions of diseases. Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF908Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment were maintained in a clean and safe operating conditions. * The ice machine located in the kitchen was not maintained in a sanitary condition. * The [NAME] Spunkmeyer countertop oven (used for baking cookies) was not maintained in a sanitary condition. These failures had the potential for the essential equipment not to function in the way they were intended and exposed the residents and staff to unsafe practices which may lead to negative outcomes.Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF909Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the inspection of all the bed to identify areas of possible entrapment to ensure safety was completed. In addition, the facility failed to inspect the bed for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 20)prior to the resident's use of bed rails. * The facility failed to ensure the entrapment assessment was completed for Resident 20 prior to the use of the bilateral upper bed rails. * The facility failed to ensure the monthly bed inspections for all beds used by the residents were completed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF801Mar 14, 2025
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the DSS was competent in the day-to-day supervision of the kitchen as evidenced by: 1. Fried eggs were not pasteurized or cooked thoroughly for one of three non-sampled residents (Resident 33). 2. The DSS did not know the correct procedure to calibrate a thermometer. 3. The DSS did not know the manufacturer guidelines for the health shakes. 4. The DSS did not ensure food preparation equipment was replaced when worn. 5. The DSS did not ensure beard coverings were available for kitchen staff with facial hair. 6. The DSS competency was not evaluated by the Administrator. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 290 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 25, 2026Standard22 findings
- May 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 26, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 14, 2025Standard29 findings
- Aug 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 8, 2024Standard5 findings
Show the 35 earlier surveys
- Nov 22, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Dec 14, 2022Standard25 findings
- Oct 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Dec 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2019Standard8 findings
- Mar 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 9, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jul 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 25, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 4, 2018Standard19 findings
- May 24, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jun 19, 2017Standard16 findings
- Jul 26, 2016Standard18 findings
- Jan 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2015Standard17 findings
- Apr 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2014Complaint6 findings
- Jul 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 19, 2014Standard16 findings
- May 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 6, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 18, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- May 22, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 19, 2013—20 findings
- Jan 17, 2013—1 finding
- May 21, 2012—1 finding
- May 17, 2012—30 findings
- Mar 26, 2012—2 findings
- Feb 2, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction