Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC
Fayetteville, Pennsylvania · CCN 395721
20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 89
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 92
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Franklin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 58 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Pennsylvania.
Last survey on record
Jul 30, 2026
102 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.44 | 3.54 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.42 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.7% | 46.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,345 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J27.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1659.3% | E933.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Oct 6, 2025
Based on clinical record review, select facility document review, policy review, review of diet guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the needs of each resident for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident 1 as evidenced by a delay in provision of emergency services which resulted in death.Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Emergency Procedure-Choking, with a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed the following, in part, Trained staff will assist the resident which is choking by attempting to expel the foreign body from the airway. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 6, 2025
Based on clinical record review, select facility document review, review of diet guidelines, review of select resident meal tray tickets, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents based on individual needs for one resident (Resident 1), which resulted in Resident 1 choking. This failure placed nine residents that had similar diet needs at a high risk for death and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (Resident 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14).Findings include:Review of facility document, titled Mechanically Altered Diets, last reviewed January 23, 2025, read, in part, Dysphagia Diet Level 2: Level 2 can tolerate (most of the time) this texture as it should be the… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Jun 5, 2025
Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and failed to ensure that residents received adequate monitoring of psychotropic medications for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 41, 66, and 67). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychoactive Drug Monitoring Policy, undated, with a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed It is the policy of the Skilled Unit of Paramount Nursing and Rehabilitation at Fayetteville, LLC. to monitor Residents who receive antidepressant, hypnotic, antianxiety, or antipsychotic medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jun 5, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 37, 41, and 67). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (death of brain tissue caused by a disruption in blood flow) and paraplegia (inability to move the lower part of the body). Review of Resident 37's quarterly minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs) dated April 16, 2025, revealed Resident 37 was coded as receiving anticoagulant medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jun 5, 2025
Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 41, and 66). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plan Policy, last reviewed January 23, 2025, read, in part, .to develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that include, but are not limited to, those identified in the comprehensive assessment . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 89 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Standard1 finding
- Oct 6, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 5, 2025Standard7 findings
- Mar 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2024Standard7 findings
- Aug 10, 2023Standard9 findings
- Sep 8, 2022Standard4 findings
- Jan 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Sep 30, 2021Standard5 findings
- Feb 13, 2020Complaint6 findings
- Feb 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2019Standard15 findings
- Nov 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Sep 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 26, 2017Standard10 findings
- Oct 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 4, 2016Standard9 findings
- Jan 22, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jan 4, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 5, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Avalon Care CenterNew Castle3 harm findings
- Nursing and Rehabilitation at the MansionSunbury1 harm finding
- Heritage Ridge Senior Living at Windy HillPhilipsburgno harm findings
- Maple Ridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterKingston1 harm finding
- Laurel Square Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterPhiladelphia1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction