Deficiency Index

Paradise Valley Health Care

National City, California · CCN 056388

20 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
81
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
86
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
San Diego
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jan 8, 2026

305 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.934.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.79—
Annual nurse turnover21.3%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,036 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1781.0%E29.5%F14.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 81 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Paradise Valley Health Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 21, 2023

    Based on interview and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their water management plan was fully implemented to prevent the potential for waterborne illnesses, including Legionella (a bacteria most commonly transmitted through contaminated water sources that could cause Legionnaires' disease). This failure had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, revised in September 2022, revealed, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section specified, 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 21, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was covered to prevent potential contamination during meal delivery to resident rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was covered during meal delivery to resident rooms located on 1 (second floor) of 3 residential floors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 29 residents who consumed their meals on the second floor of the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, revised in November 2022, revealed, When meals are assembled in the kitchen and then delivered to residents' rooms or dining areas to be distributed, covering foods is appropriate, either individually or in a mobile food cart. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 7, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practice when: 1. Two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA 70, 71) entered, and exited the PUI isolation rooms (Person Under Investigation for COVID-19 [a contagious respiratory infection]) without performing hand hygiene, not wearing gloves and gowns while handling and passing meal trays in between residents. 2. The facility placed in the same room, residents that were considered PUI and residents that have been cleared and had completed quarantine days (a period of isolation). These failures had the potential to spread infection amongst the residents, staff, and visitors. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jan 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an appropriate care plan and admission orders to ensure safety interventions were in place, including maintaining non-weightbearing (NWB) status and keeping the immobilizer/splint on at all times, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practiced placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening of the right lower extremity (RLE) fracture, delayed healing, increased pain, falls and additional injury due to not having proper instructions and interventions in place. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jan 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician (MD) orders and failed to put safety measures in place to prevent injury, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice placed one resident (Resident 1) at risk for worsening of a fracture, unsafe movement of the injured limb, potential accidents (falls)and additional injury due to failure to carry out non-weight bearing (NWB) and continuous immobilizer orders.Cross Reference F656Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Periprosthetic Fracture around Internal Prosthetic Right Knee Joint (a break in the bone surrounding the replaced joint).A record review of Resident… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 81 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 8, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Apr 16, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Oct 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Mar 24, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Mar 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2019Standard5 findings
  • May 3, 2018Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Oct 2, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Nov 1, 2013—8 findings
  • Nov 20, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 15, 2012—5 findings
  • Oct 6, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction