Paloma Springs Healthcare LLC
T Or C, New Mexico · CCN 325062
28 surveys since 2011, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 153
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 13
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 94
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
- County
- Sierra · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 58 for-profit facilities in New Mexico.
Last survey on record
Jun 25, 2026
137 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.11 | 3.44 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.44 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.0% | 53.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $19,971 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1639.0% | E2151.2% | F37.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8425×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6253×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F7563×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Paloma Springs Healthcare LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 12, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of care (reasonable degree of care a person should provide to another person, typically in a professional or medical setting) for 1 (R #242) of 2 (R #192 and R #242) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, when staff failed to: 1. Monitor wound progression. 2. Notify the provider about changes in wound condition. 3. Administer prescribed antibiotics in a timely manner. This deficient practice likely resulted in unnecessary worsening of R #242's wound, pain, and suffering. The findings are: A. Record review of R #242's medical record revealed the following: 1. R #242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 28, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for all 81 residents who eat food from the kitchen (residents were identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 04/21/25), when they failed to label and date dessert items in the kitchen refrigerator. If the facility fails to store food under safe and sanitary conditions then this could likely lead to foodborne illnesses (Foodborne illness can occur if you eat foods that are contaminated with harmful pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi) in residents. The findings are: A. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF756Feb 12, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff acted upon pharmacy recommendations for all 85 residents in the facility (residents were identified on the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24), when they failed to get the pharmacy recommendations back from the provider with instructions to accept or decline recommendations, within 30 days of the facility receiving the pharmacy recommendations. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being at a higher risk of adverse (undesired harmful effect resulting from medication) side effects. The findings are: A. Record review of the Pharmacy Recommendations, for November 2023, revealed the following: 1. The pharmacist conducted a facility wide Medication Regimen Review on 11/11/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 12, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow procedures in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, when they failed to: 1. Ensure the chemical sanitation solution was maintained at the correct concentration. 2. Properly label opened food items in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer. This failure had the potential to affect all 81 residents in the facility who eat food prepared in the kitchen. Residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24. If the facility fails to adhere safe food storage then residents are likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses. The findings are: Sanitizer Solution A. On 02/05/24 at 10:05 AM, during an observation, the kitchen revealed the following: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 6, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff follow proper infection control practices when the facility failed to: 1. Screen surveyors for signs/symptoms of Covid-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus). 2. Have unvaccinated staff wear their N-95 mask in the dining area. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the Census list Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 04/05/22). This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infection and could cause residents to become sick. The findings are: Screening A. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 153 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Aug 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 28, 2025Standard12 findings
- Jan 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 22, 2023Complaint6 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Nov 2, 2022Standard6 findings
- Apr 6, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Aug 25, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jun 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 12, 2020Standard8 findings
- Oct 10, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Aug 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2019Standard and complaint13 findings
- Dec 20, 2018Complaint7 findings · 6 harm
- Jun 25, 2018Standard6 findings
- Oct 25, 2017Complaint9 findings · 6 harm
- Aug 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 31, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jun 10, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jun 19, 2015Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 22, 2014Standard17 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 16, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 27, 2013—2 findings
- Jul 27, 2012—6 findings
- May 18, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction