Pacifica Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Pacifica, California · CCN 056205
15 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 68
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- San Mateo
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 22, 2024
717 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.25 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.10 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 28.7% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D350.0% | E233.3% | F116.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pacifica Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe operations when swirl bowls were stored wet. Findings: According to the 2022 Federal Food Code, equipment and utensils are to be air dried. During a concurrent observation and concurrent interview on 11/20/24 at 1:15 p.m., in the kitchen, with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, clear bowls were placed on a tray stacked within one another that were wet on the inside. DA 1 stated tableware (term for all the dishes, utensils used for eating and serving food) were dried before stacking. During a concurrent observation and concurrent interview on 11/20/24 at 1:18 p.m., with the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFNS), showed clear bowls placed on a tray stacked within one another that were wet on the inside. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Nov 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff initialed and dated lidocaine patches (pain medication delivered through the skin from applying patches) after applying the patches to affected areas on two out of two residents (Resident 5 and Resident 15). This failure has the potential for residents to not receive the full therapeutic effects of the pain medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review on 11/18/24 at 9:30 a.m. on the second floor, second team at resident 15's bedside, the resident did not want to sit up. The resident was asked to roll over onto his left side with LVN2's (licensed vocational nurse) help which he did. The resident's affected area was his lower back. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 24, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention and control program when: 1. Housekeeping Staff (HKS) 1 did not remove gown and gloves, (types of personal protective equipment (PPE), worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) before exiting a resident's room, in the facility's COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019, a respiratory infectious disease) unit (a designated area or floor for residents who were confirmed positive for COVID-19). 2. HKS 1 wore an N95 respirator (a respiratory protective device designed to filter airborne particles) with the lower strap hanging loose below the chin, in the facility's designated COVID-19 unit. 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF661Nov 22, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's discharge summary (provides necessary information to continuing care providers pertaining to the course of treatment while the resident was in the facility and the resident's plans for care after discharge) included an accurate recapitulation of stay (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) and reconciliation of medications (a process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list of both prescription and over the counter medications that includes the drug name, dosage, frequency, route, and indication for use) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jun 4, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment of one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) accurately reflected the resident's redness on his right chest on 9/8/23, 9/9/23, 9/10/23, 9/12/23, 9/13/23, 9/14/23, 9/15/23, 9/17/23, and 9/19/23. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving appropriate treatments and services. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] (Saturday) for rehab after his hospital stay from 8/12/23 to 8/26/23 due to his fall. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 22, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 4, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Aug 24, 2023Standard1 finding
- Sep 13, 2019Standard3 findings
- Sep 17, 2018Standard5 findings
- Sep 29, 2017Standard4 findings
- Sep 23, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 17, 2016Complaint1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Oct 5, 2015Standard3 findings
- Aug 15, 2014Standard6 findings
- Jul 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 8, 2013—5 findings
- Aug 17, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 19, 2012—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction