Pacific Care Nursing Center
Long Beach, California · CCN 056007
50 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 189
- Surveys
- 50
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1968
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
May 11, 2026
182 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 6.08 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $109,360 across 4 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G45.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4970.0% | E1318.6% | F45.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8806×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pacific Care Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Mar 18, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with diagnoses of seizure (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain), convulsions ( rapid, involuntary muscle contractions that cause uncontrollable shaking and limb movement ) or epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures), and on anti-seizure medications (medications used to prevent or treat seizures or convulsions by controlling abnormal electrical activity in the brain), had seizure precautions (safety measures to prevent/lessen possible injuries during a seizure activity such as padded siderails and bed in low position), in place for three of 25 sampled residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 11, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents, at high risk for falls and injuries, received fall prevention interventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).The facility failed to:1.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was aware of Resident 1's high fall-risk status.2. Ensure Resident 1's physician (MD) orders dated 2/12/2026 for fall prevention devices including floor mats (cushioned pads placed on the floor besides a resident's bed to decrease the impact of a fall) and bilateral bolsters (firm, padded foam cushions placed along the sides of a bed to act as soft, safe bumpers to prevent residents from rolling out of bed) were not discontinued on 2/13/2026, despite Resident 1 continuing to be assessed as high risk for falls and… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jan 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a history of acute stroke ([CVA]- loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and complained of having a slurred speech, a headache, and severe pain in left arm was timely transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) to prevent ischemic (a condition that occurs when blood flow to an organ, muscle group, or tissue is reduced resulting in a lack of oxygen) stroke for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN unknown) assessed Resident 1 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, reported on 1/9/2025 at 1 p.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 2, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was admitted with intact skin did not develop a pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) while in the facility, and a resident who was admitted with a pressure injury had measures in place to prevent the existing pressure injury from getting worse for two of two residents (Resident 2 and 12). The facility failed to: 1. Implement Resident 2's care plan, titled Alteration in Skin integrity intervention to turn and reposition the resident at least every two hours and as needed from 1/2024 to 3/2024 to prevent Resident 2 from developing the pressure injuries to the right and left lateral (to the side of, or away from, the middle of the body)… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 9, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable Stage IV (skin damage that extends to the muscle, tendon, or bone) pressure sore (skin injury from prolonged pressure on the skin and tissue underneath) on the sacro-coccyx (tail bone area) area for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 2 was repositioned at least every two hours, as indicated in the care plan to relieve the pressure from the sacro-coccyx area. b. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 189 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2026Standard6 findings
- May 11, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 4, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2025Standard16 findings
- Mar 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 24, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 42 earlier surveys
- Dec 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 2, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 30, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2024Standard14 findings
- Jun 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 18, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 9, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Apr 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2021Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2019Standard7 findings
- Dec 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 9, 2018Standard7 findings
- Nov 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jan 28, 2018Standard14 findings
- Sep 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 12, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 1, 2017Standard10 findings
- Jan 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2015Standard15 findings
- Sep 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2014Standard8 findings
- May 15, 2013—11 findings
- Mar 21, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 14, 2012—6 findings
- Mar 8, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 26, 2010—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction