Medical Center Convalescent Hospital
San Bernardino, California · CCN 056436
35 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 190
- Surveys
- 35
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- EVA CARE GROUP
- County
- San Bernardino
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Feb 26, 2026
256 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.06 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 28.4% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2573.5% | E38.8% | F617.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F8042×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Medical Center Convalescent Hospital, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF812Jun 7, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Two of two ice machines were not kept in sanitary condition and put residents at risk for food borne illness. 2. One pan of meat was thawing in the refrigerator and desserts were stored under the meat which is a potential for contamination. 3. One microwave available to heat resident food was not kept in sanitary condition which could be transferred to resident food during reheating. 4. Two drawers and two trays were lined with parchment paper and dirt and debris was visible under the liner, that had the potential to transfer to food. 5. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF604Sep 9, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedures for the use of physical restraints was followed for five of five Justice -Involved Residents (JIR, residents under the care of law enforcement, community supervision, in custody, held involuntarily through operation of law enforcement authorities) (Residents 1,2, 3, 4, and 5) were denied the right to be treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for the purpose of discipline and not required to treat the resident ' s medical condition. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 5, 2022
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure supervision of one of three residents (Resident A) identified as being an elopement (leaving building without permission from the physician) risk, when the facility discontinued the one on one supervision (one staff remains with resident at all times) due to insurance not paying for the service for this conserved resident (the court appoints a person to manage affairs of another person deemed by the court not competent to do so for themself) who had a history of elopement attempts and of removing his wander guard ( a device that will set off an alarm if a resident attempts to leave through any exit door). […]
- Actual harm, patternF550Sep 9, 2022
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's rights were honored for Justice Involved Residents (residents in custody) five of five residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and had their needs met consistent with federal regulations ensuring all residents have equal access to care regardless of their diagnoses, when the facility allowed the criminal justice system to deny the same treatment and rights such as participation in activities of their choice and freedom of movement around the facility to these five clients. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 26, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere with established food safety and sanitation standards when:1. A plastic wrapped container of beef roast was observed without a label indicating the preparation date, freeze by date, or discard date.2. Clean wet dishes were stacked on top of each other and not air dried.These had the potential to place susceptible residents who receive food from Dietary Services at risk for food-borne illnesses.Findings: 1. […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 190 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 26, 2026Standard12 findings
- Feb 6, 2025Standard4 findings
- Sep 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2023Standard17 findings
- Nov 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 9, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 27 earlier surveys
- Jun 7, 2021Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 22, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2019Standard8 findings
- Nov 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2018Standard16 findings
- May 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 29, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 26, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jun 20, 2016Standard31 findings · 5 harm
- May 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 30, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jun 23, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 7, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 22, 2014Standard9 findings
- Nov 8, 2013—10 findings
- Oct 30, 2012—25 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 15, 2011—15 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction