Oskaloosa Care Center
Oskaloosa, Iowa · CCN 165589
25 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 68
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 83
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Mahaska · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2008
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.66 | 3.54 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.31 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 62.6% | 44.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $45,354 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2575.8% | E618.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6413×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oskaloosa Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Sep 17, 2025
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) in accordance with the resident's wishes, and follow the physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation status(Resident #1). The facility failed to correctly identify that Resident #1 desired CPR related to discrepancies in code status listed in multiple locations and a staff member incorrectly reading the resident's chart. Approximately 7 minutes after Resident #1 was last seen alive, the Advanced Registered Nursing Practitioner(ARNP) issued an order to withhold CPR due to the facility staff's delays. The facility staff also lacked knowledge of how to locate the facility's crash cart. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684May 18, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to assess and provide a timely intervention for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #1, #4, #5). Resident #1 had little to no urinary output for 3 days without intervention. Residents #4 & #5 clinical records for urinary output lacked documentation. The facility failed to notify the attending physician of blood glucose levels greater than 400 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1). This failure resulted in possible distress for the resident, therefore causing an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health, safety, and security of the resident. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 17, 2025
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to carry out timely assessments and interventions after a resident complained of chest pain for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 76 residents.Findings included:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/8/25 listed diagnoses for Resident #9 which included hypertension(high blood pressure), nonrhematic aortic stenosis(a condition where the aortic valve, which controls blood flow from the heart to the body, becomes narrowed or obstructed), and weakness and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 18, 2023
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to talk to residents with respect and provide care in a respectful manner in an environment that enhanced his or her self-esteem and self-worth for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident # 2, #3, and #6). The facility staff and temporary agency staff failed to incorporate the resident's goals, preferences and choices. The facility reported a resident census of 76. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Apr 15, 2026
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding following physician's treatment orders (Resident #4) and monitoring for adverse reactions to immunizations (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #11, #13, #14) for 11 of 13 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include:1. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating cognitively intact. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 68 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Standard4 findings
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 15, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Nov 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 17, 2025Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 19, 2025Standard5 findings
- Jan 23, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Aug 1, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Jan 10, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- May 18, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 27, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jul 13, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jun 1, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Nov 3, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 18, 2019Standard4 findings
- Dec 17, 2015Standard1 finding
- Feb 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 6, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 26, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 23, 2012—1 finding
- Jul 14, 2011—2 findings
- Dec 16, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction