Deficiency Index

Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown

Marshalltown, Iowa · CCN 165451

28 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
131
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
84
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ACCURA HEALTHCARE
County
Marshall · rural
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.15—
Annual nurse turnover42.3%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,350 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG37.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2866.7%E819.0%F24.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.4%
CMS’s current file: 42 of the 131 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6882×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 9, 2025

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). As a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) finished giving Resident #1 his bath, the CNA turned the water to cold and purposely sprayed him. Resident #1 became angry, grabbed the shower head and slapped it against the wall. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings included:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Nov 2, 2023

    Based on clinical record review, primary physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were given medications as prescribed by the physician, when a nurse administered the wrong medications to the wrong resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings Include: The Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #52 dated 10/18/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition for decision making. The MDS revealed he had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), arthritis, compression fracture, and neoplasm of the prostate. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 25, 2023

    Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately reflect the needs for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed in regards to supervision and care (Resident #1). Resident #1 was found outside lying on the ground unsupervised in hot weather wearing sweaters. Resident #1 required hospitalization related to heat exhaustion and dehydration. The resident's cognition had declined and the Care Plan was not updated to direct staff on how to keep Resident #1 safe. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings Include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #1 that included early onset Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and heart failure. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Mar 12, 2026

    Based on review of the nursing schedule, staff interviews, Payroll Based Journal Data Report, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for eight (8) consecutive hours per day for 19 days between December 1, 2025 - March 8, 2026. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's nursing schedules for December 2025 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 6th, 7th, 20th, 21st, 25th, and 31st.Review of the facility's nursing schedules for January 2026 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 1st, 3rd, 4th, 17th, 18th and 31st. Review of the facility's nursing schedules for February 2026 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 1st, 12th, 14th, 15th, 24th, and 28th. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865Apr 24, 2025

    Based on review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, the facilities past surveys, and staff interview, the facility failed to correct their own deficiencies for 3 of 15 areas of concern. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The facility QAPI Plan dated 5/23/23 documented the purpose as to identify and correct quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement in the lives of nursing home residents with a systematic approach. To do this, all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts which support our mission. Principals of the QAPI system included, in summary: a. The outcome of QAPI is for resident quality of care and quality of life. b. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 131 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 12, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Nov 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 9, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 24, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jan 15, 2025Complaint6 findings
  • Nov 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2024Standard8 findings
  • Nov 2, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Jul 25, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 9, 2022Standard4 findings
  • May 4, 2021Standard9 findings
  • Mar 1, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 27, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Mar 15, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jul 21, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 28, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 11, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 31, 2014—7 findings
  • Nov 14, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 15, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 19, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 27, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2011—1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 15, 2010—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction