Orchard Manor
Lancaster, Wisconsin · CCN 525290
19 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 88
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 74
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Grant · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 15, 2024
816 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.49 | 4.50 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.96 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.8% | 37.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $22,425 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G222.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D555.6% | E111.1% | F111.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orchard Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 15, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent or heal pressure injuries (PI) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R9 & R3) reviewed for pressure injuries out of a total sample of 12. R9 was admitted with bilateral heel pressure injuries. The facility did not implement immediate offloading of the bilateral heels and the heels deteriorated. R9's wounds were not measured weekly, and her physician was not updated timely on changes to her wounds. R9 was observed not having her heels offloaded while seated in her recliner. R3 developed a facility acquired PI. The facility failed to measure and assess the PI weekly. R3's PI became infected multiple times requiring antibiotics. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF580May 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the residents' physician was consulted when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 17 residents (R48). R48 had a change in weight status and the facility did not consult R48's physician per physician orders, resulting in R48 having to go to the emergency room with CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) exacerbation requiring medical intervention and a hospital stay. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Physician Notification, reviewed 4/6/22, includes, in part: The professional nursing staff will notify the resident's physician when a change in the resident's condition has occurred. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 17, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the preparation of food in a clean and sanitary environment with potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. Surveyor observed the facility's downstairs freezer to have liquid dripping from the ceiling into boxes of food that was no longer sealed by the manufacturer. Surveyor observed Cook K wet stacking clean cups. Cook K indicated she was talked to the previous year by Surveyors for not allowing the dishes to air dry completely and knows she should allow them to dry completely before stacking them. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections such as COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents (R) in the facility. -The facility did not have a system in place to keep up to date on COVID-19 guidance. -The facility did not place residents (R22, R36, and R41) that were unvaccinated in TBP (Transmission Based Precautions) during a COVID-19 outbreak. -Staff were hanging gowns used in a COVID-19 positive room on the outside of the room door. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF687Aug 15, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents that are diabetic received routine diabetic foot checks in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R3, R9), and 2 of 2 supplemental residents (R11, R27) reviewed for diabetic foot checks. R11 has no documentation of diabetic foot checks. R27 has documentation of once per month diabetic foot checks. R3's diabetic foot checks are not done daily. R9's diabetic foot checks are not done daily. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 88 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 15, 2024Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- May 17, 2023Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 24, 2022Standard9 findings
- Jan 30, 2020Standard2 findings
- May 6, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 8, 2018Standard2 findings
- Aug 10, 2017Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Jul 25, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- May 19, 2015Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 17, 2014Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 17, 2014Standard7 findings
- Sep 25, 2013—4 findings
- May 1, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 21, 2013—6 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 5, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 8, 2011—13 findings
- Oct 14, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction