Orchard Creek Skilled Nursing
Traverse City, Michigan · CCN 235611
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 83
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 22
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Leelanau
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 71 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Sep 4, 2025
431 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.75 | 3.86 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.21 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.9% | 45.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Payment denials
- 1
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G210.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1052.6% | E— | F526.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C210.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8382×
Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
- F5521×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orchard Creek Skilled Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 4, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by facility staff for one Resident (#4) of one residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when Resident #4 experienced unnecessary pain and persistent feelings of fear and anxiety.Findings include:Resident #4 (R4) Review of R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/13/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, difficulty in walking, and pain in right shoulder. Review of R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 25, 2023
This citation pertains to Intake MI00137609. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one Resident (#18) of one resident reviewed, resulting in Resident #18 falling with staff present and sustaining multiple fractures requiring hospitalization and surgery. Findings include: Resident #18 (R18) Review of a Post Fall/Incident Note dated 4/8/2023 revealed R18 fell in the bathroom while the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was with her. The note revealed [Patient] washed her hand, turned to get towel, and lost balance. fell on left side of face and body. Injuries included laceration on left eyebrow, bleeding around scab on left elbow, and bruising lateral side of left calf. The note revealed R18 was transferred to the hospital. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Sep 4, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. Findings include: On 9/3/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) J and K in regard to complaints of low staffing numbers. CNAs J and K confirmed that during shift change, residents can wait 30 to 45 minutes after report for staff to come and assist. CNA K stated, Sometimes it can be up to 45 minutes before we are out on the floor and then we have to get people up, get them dressed, toilet, vitals, breakfast, etc. When there are only two of us, it can be a challenge, and they (residents) have to wait a long time. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 4, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by:Failing to label, date, and discard expired food in the reach-in refrigerator, walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, and dry storage. Failing to ensure kitchen utensils were stored in a sanitary manner.Failing to ensure the ice cube machine/bin was free from mold accumulation.These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all of the 17 residents in the facility.Findings include: On 9/2/25 at 11:24 PM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) G. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Sep 4, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to annually review and update the required Facility Assessment, resulting in the potential for unidentified resources necessary to provide care and services to the resident population.Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment document provided by the facility revealed the Facility Assessment was last completed, updated, or reviewed on 8/6/24.In an interview on 9/4/25 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the Facility Assessment had not been completed, updated, or reviewed since 8/6/24.
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 83 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 4, 2025Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 2, 2024Standard1 finding
- Oct 25, 2023Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 8, 2022Standard6 findings
- Jun 9, 2021Standard4 findings
- Sep 6, 2019Standard13 findings
- May 15, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 26, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Oct 12, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jan 11, 2017Standard5 findings
- Sep 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 18, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Apr 8, 2015Standard2 findings
- Feb 27, 2014—3 findings
- Oct 9, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 28, 2012—2 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction