Deficiency Index

Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Whitehall

Whitehall, Michigan · CCN 235206

39 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
231
Surveys
39
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse14

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/39

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION
County
Muskegon
Medicare-certified since
1971

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 89 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.71—
Annual nurse turnover57.8%47.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG35.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3152.5%E1830.5%F610.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 59 of the 231 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6846×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6584×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Whitehall, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, patternF744Jun 30, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person centered interventions and approaches to address behaviors exhibited by residents with dementia for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #4), resulting in continued unsupervised wandering, repeated unwitnessed falls and injuries and the potential for all 13 residents who wander at risk for further unwitnessed incidents and accidents, harm, and abuse. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 5, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R6, R7, R9, R15, R26, R34, R35, R58 and F60) right to be free from mental abuse and verbal abuse by R52 resulting in fear and physical anguish in the resident's home. Findings include:Resident #58 (R58)Review of an Face Sheet revealed R58 admitted to the facility 3/4/2025 with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, acute respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 5, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights in a CHF resident and drug allergies in one (R89) and failed to implement and monitor ace wrap orders for one (R40) of two residents reviewed for change in condition, contributing to R89's death in the facility. Findings include:R89Review of a Face Sheet revealed R89 had pertinent diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes and vascular dementia. Allergies: . Morphine (Opioid). WeightsReview of R89's weights revealed between January 2025 and July 2025 his weights averaged between 331 pounds (lbs) to 336 pounds. On August 17, 2025, R89's weight was 347 lbs. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 5, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent further pressure ulcer development for 1 resident (R7) out of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in 3 facility acquired pressure ulcers for R7. Findings include:Review of an Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stage IV sacral pressure ulcer. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R29, with a reference date of 12/18/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R7 was… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 3, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document weekly skin assessments, monitor wounds, and promote the healing of pressure ulcers for one resident, Resident #537 (R537) reviewed for skin integrity and pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in R537's skin impairments, two Stage II, one unstageable and one Stage III pressure ulcer to go unassessed, measured, and monitored and potential for nonhealing and infection to occur. Findings include: The facility provided a copy of the policy for Skin Monitoring and Management - Pressure Ulcer dated 7/11/2018 for review. […]

Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 231 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard15 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 17, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 10, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Sep 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 31 earlier surveys
  • Feb 29, 2024Standard18 findings
  • Aug 18, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 3, 2023Standard23 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 7, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 15, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2020Complaint7 findings
  • Sep 18, 2019Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2018Standard22 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 7, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Apr 14, 2017Complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Oct 8, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 8, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Mar 13, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2014Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 18, 2014Standard8 findings
  • May 17, 2013—6 findings
  • Jun 22, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 8, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 26, 2011—5 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction