Oaks of West Kettering the
Kettering, Ohio · CCN 365321
37 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 135
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Apr 9, 2026
214 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.79 | 3.51 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.1% | 51.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $173,572 across 4 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G58.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4270.0% | E915.0% | F46.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8806×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oaks of West Kettering the, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF740Dec 13, 2022
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of hospital records, review of staff statements, review of hospice notes, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate behavioral health services for one Resident (#78) who voiced suicidal ideations. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening injury, harm, impairment, and/or death, when Resident #78 told Hospice Nurse #150 maybe someday they'll come in and find me hanging, was left unsupervised on 10/17/22 from 2:43 P.M until 3:28 P.M. and was subsequently found unresponsive with a call light cord wrapped around his neck. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 3, 2026
Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, facility policy review, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess a resident's skin and failed to timely identify pressure ulcers (injuries to skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, usually over bony areas like the hips, heels, or tailbone) until they had reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #116 on 12/22/25, when the resident was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers, was assessed to be at risk for development of pressure ulcers and developed an avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer (a full-thickness wound where damage depth is hidden by slough [a soft, moist, yellow or… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 3, 2026
Based on record review, review of emergency room (ER) records, staff interview, review of the facility's investigation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely turned in bed during incontinence care resulting in the resident falling out of bed. This resulted in Actual Harm when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #355 was providing incontinence care to Resident #116 and the resident rolled out of the bed onto the floor. Resident #116 was sent to hospital and was diagnosed with a head injury which required staples. This affected one (Resident #116) of the three residents reviewed falls. The facility census was 107.Findings included: Review of the medical record review for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 11/12/25 and discharged home on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 22, 2025
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation, review of maintenance logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents/hazards. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #66 utilized the first-floor restroom on 12/15/24 and while washing his hands, the floating handwashing sink fell on him resulting in a laceration to the left knee that required 17 sutures, the use of antibiotics for infection prevention and continued wound care. This affected one (#66) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 101. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #66, revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of a police report, review of facility document, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a visitor for one (Resident #137) of three resident's reviewed for abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm on 04/09/24 when Resident #48's significant other, Family Member (FM) #16, touched Resident #137's breasts and private area and exposed his genitalia to the resident on a patio in the facility courtyard where residents smoked. FM #16 admitted to the police that he committed the actions against the resident, despite Resident #137 telling him, No. The failure resulted in Resident #137 being tearful and so traumatized by this event, that it felt like she was raped. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 135 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2026Standard20 findings
- Apr 9, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Mar 3, 2026Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 24, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 20, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Jan 22, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- May 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 31, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Mar 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 27, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Sep 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Aug 4, 2021Standard15 findings
- Mar 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 21, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Nov 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 22, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 4, 2019Standard16 findings
- Mar 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 12, 2018Standard10 findings
- Mar 22, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 29, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Nov 19, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jun 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2014Standard2 findings
- Feb 3, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 10, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction