Deficiency Index

Oakhurst Health & Rehabilitation

Fork Union, Virginia · CCN 495230

16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
County
Fluvanna
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 33 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Jul 2, 2026

130 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.993.46
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—
Annual nurse turnover82.1%55.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$18,590 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG46.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4670.8%E1320.0%F11.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.5%
CMS’s current file: 65 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6073×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oakhurst Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 29, 2025

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by failure to provide timely identification and management of a pressure wound for one resident, Resident #4 (R4) in a survey sample of six residents, which deprived the resident of needed care to avoid physical harm of severe wound deterioration. by facility staff with regards to identification and treatment of a pressure ulcer until it was at an advanced stage and neglected to implement and treat a pressure ulcer for one resident, Resident #4 (R4) in a survey sample of six residents which resulted in harm for R4. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 29, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to identify a pressure ulcer until it was at an advanced stage, implement and treat a pressure ulcer for one resident, Resident #4 (R4) in a survey sample of six residents which resulted in harm for R4. The findings included: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff discovered an in-house acquired pressure wound, which was at an advanced stage upon discovery, as evidenced by having greater than 70% slough (dead tissue). Upon identification, the facility staff initiated a one-time treatment without a physician order and failed to obtain treatment orders for ongoing treatment of the wound. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 6, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and/or services to prevent accidents for 2 of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident #48 and Resident #11. Resident #48 was not provided adequate monitoring/supervision, sustained an injury of unknown origin on his head that required 5 staples, resulting in harm. Resident #11 was not provided fall mats as required in her care plan. The findings include: 1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included infarction, [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)] affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness, dementia with behavioral disturbance, [CONDITION(S)], anxiety, hypertension, depression, dysphasia and [CONDITION(S)]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF887Feb 22, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer the COVID-19 spike vaccine booster for the 2023-2024 season, to 5 of 5 residents (Resident #6, 31, 3, 55, and 14) and 5 of 5 staff (RN #3, CNA #6, Other Employee #1, Other Employee #5, and Other Employee #7) sampled. The findings included: 1. For five residents (R6, R31, R3, R55 and R14), the facility staff failed to provide education and offer the COVID-19 spike vaccine booster for the 2023-2024 season. On 2/20/24 and 2/21/24, clinical record reviews were conducted of R6, R31, R3, R55 and R14's charts. This review revealed no evidence that any of the sampled residents had been offered the COVID-19 spike vaccine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF580Jul 2, 2026

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician or responsible party of a change in condition and/or need to alter treatment for two of seven residents, Residents #1 and #2. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1) the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of change in condition. R1 diagnoses include but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease (1), aphasia (2) dysphagia (3), and protein-calorie malnutrition (4). On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), nursing home discharge of 6/6/2026, the resident's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score was not entered. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 2, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 10, 2025Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 29, 2025Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard17 findings
  • Dec 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 6, 2021Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2019Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Feb 8, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Nov 12, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Feb 5, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jan 28, 2014—12 findings
  • Jan 16, 2013—9 findings
  • Jan 5, 2012—8 findings
  • Nov 18, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction