Deficiency Index

Oakhaven Nursing Center

Darlington, South Carolina · CCN 425064

8 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
22
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
WILSON SENIOR CARE
County
Darlington
Medicare-certified since
1969

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=1, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 3, 2024

767 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.943.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.46—
Annual nurse turnover30.9%47.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 22 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oakhaven Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Oct 3, 2024

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the advance directive information kept in the electronic health record (EHR) and hard chart reflected the same advance directive decision for Resident (R)48. This has the potential to allow the facility to not be able to carry out the resident's correct advance directive decision. Findings Include: Review of facility's policy titled, Advance Directive with a revision date of 01/24 revealed, Each resident shall be deemed a Full Code until we have the appropriate DNR documents signed by the resident or responsible party and physician. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 22 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 3, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Apr 26, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Mar 12, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2014Complaint6 findings · 6 harm
  • Apr 27, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction