Honorage Nursing Center
Florence, South Carolina · CCN 425115
11 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 88
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- WILSON SENIOR CARE
- County
- Florence
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 30, 2024
893 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.46 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.2% | 47.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D583.3% | E116.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Honorage Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Mar 17, 2022
Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Bedhold Notification/Policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)32, R30, R33 and R51 and/or their responsible party received the Bedhold Notification Policy with the bed hold amount in a timely manner for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization s. Findings include: The facility admitted R32 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review on 3/15/22 at 1:30 PM of the medical record for R32 revealed confirmation of a hospital stay starting 1/8/22 and returning to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561May 30, 2024
Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to honor Resident (R)8's choices for bathing and showering, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living revealed, staff assists or performs activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, grooming, eating, toileting, etc ) as indicated. Review of R8's Face Sheet revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], due to system conversion, original admitted was 06/15/23, with diagnoses including but not limited to: heart failure, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's Disease and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689May 30, 2024
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R)50, to prevent potential accidents. Findings include: The facility does not have a policy on Supervision for residents. Review of R50's Face Sheet revealed R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: insomnia, altered mental status, post concessional syndrome, contusion of unspecified part of head, and unspecified dementia. Review of R50's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/24, revealed R50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15, indicating R50 has severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Mar 17, 2022
Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Schedule Policy and Procedure, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 32 was free of significant medication errors. R32 did not receive the medication, [MEDICATION(S)] 0.4 milligrams (mg) as ordered for chest pain for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization . Findings Include: The facility admitted R32 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review on 3/17/22 at 10:42 AM of the Medication Administration Record [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Further review on 3/17/22 at 10:45 AM of the MAR indicated [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Mar 17, 2022
Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, manufacturer package insert, pharmacy labeling and facility policy, the facility failed to assure that in-use insulin was properly dated as to opening and expiration dates and that expired insulin had been removed from active storage on 1 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: On [DATE] at approximately 10:26 AM, inspection of the East Wing Medication Cart A revealed one opened [MEDICATION(S)] R Insulin vial, 100 U (unit)/ml (milliliter), belonging to Resident (R)43, not dated as to date of opening or expiration and one [MEDICATION(S)] R Insulin [MEDICATION(S)] 100 U/ml, belonging to R29, dated by the facility as opened [DATE] with no expiration date. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 30, 2024Standard2 findings
- Mar 17, 2022Standard4 findings
- Oct 21, 2020Standard and complaint1 finding
- Sep 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2019Standard4 findings
- Mar 9, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jan 13, 2017Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 24, 2015Standard9 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Oct 28, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 19, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jan 27, 2011—7 findings · 5 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction