Deficiency Index

Oak Grove Healthcare

Rutherfordton, North Carolina · CCN 345464

13 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVARDIS HEALTH
County
Rutherford · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 3, 2025

341 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.043.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover54.0%45.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD480.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C120.0%
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oak Grove Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF602Sep 6, 2024

    Based on record reviews and interviews with staff, residents, responsible parties, and the Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to protect resident's rights to be free of misappropriation of controlled substances for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #212 and Resident #49). The findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation policy, last revised on 11/16/2022, revealed in part the facility would ensure all residents were free from misappropriation of property. a. Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, and protein-calorie malnutrition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Sep 6, 2024

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the areas of Level II Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (Resident #17 and Resident #27), and anticoagulants (Resident #23). This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings included: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. Resident #17's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an annual assessment dated [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jul 13, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate advance directives throughout the medical record for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #204). The findings included: Resident #204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #204's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated a physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A document entitled, Advance Directives Discussion Document, dated [DATE] in Resident #204's paper chart indicated to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and that Resident #204 had a living will. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 13, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update care plans to reflect weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #39) and failed to update care plans for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #17). The findings included: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact and weighed 97 pounds. Review of the facility's care plan meeting minutes dated 3/9/2022 revealed the facility was aware of Resident #39's history of permanent loss of taste and smell. Review of Resident #39's care plan dated 3/16/2022 revealed a focus area for potential for nutritional problem. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Dec 3, 2025

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data for 1 of 4 days of the survey (11/30/25) and maintain posted daily nurse staffing data sheets for 83 of 169 days reviewed from June 2025 through December 2025.The findings included:Observation of the daily nurse staffing sheet on 11/30/2025 at 10:30 AM, and 12:46 PM revealed a daily nurse staffing sheet dated 11/25/2025.Review of the daily nurse staffing sheets from 6/18/2025 through 12/3/2025 revealed there were 83 days of daily nurse staffing sheets missing: 6/21/25, 6/22/25, 6/28/25, 7/4/25 through 7/8/25, 7/12/25, 7/13/25, 7/16/25, 7/19/25 through 7/21/25, 7/26/25 through 7/28/25, 8/2/25, 8/3/25, 8/9/25, 8/10/25, 8/16/25, 8/17/25, 8/23/25 through 8/26/25, 8/29/25 through… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 3, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jul 13, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Feb 8, 2018Standard4 findings
  • May 11, 2017Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2015Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jan 23, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Sep 26, 2013—4 findings
  • Jul 13, 2012—4 findings
  • Apr 13, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 12, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction