Deficiency Index

Fair Haven Home Inc

Bostic, North Carolina · CCN 345425

10 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
21
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
30
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Rutherford · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2025

489 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.643.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—
Annual nurse turnover28.1%45.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 21 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Fair Haven Home Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 8, 2024

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to: 1) ensure items stored ready for use were labeled and dated in the walk-in freezer; 2) remove expired food items in 1 of 2 coolers. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: a An observation and interview conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on [DATE] at 10:00 AM revealed there were two bags of hash browns (20 each) that were not labeled or dated in the walk-in freezer. The DM could not recall when they had been placed in the freezer and indicated the bags should labeled and dated. b. An observation conducted on [DATE] at 10:05 AM revealed two packages of ten pounds of ground beef on a tray with thaw date [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Jul 8, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their Hand Hygiene policy and procedure when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 did not doff her gloves, perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves after removing a dressing and before cleaning the wound during wound care to Resident #26. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 8 staff members observed for infection control practices (NA #1). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy entitled Hand Hygiene last updated May 2025 read in part: Policy: All staff will perform hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jan 4, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents sampled for accidents (Resident #15). The findings included: Resident #15 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two or more staff with transfers and toilet use. Review of Resident #15's care plan dated 10/31/22 revealed Resident #15 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to weakness and decreased mobility with admission to hospice services with diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Jan 22, 2021

    Based on observations, record reviews, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess and monitor the ability of a resident to safely self-administer oral medications that were observed in the resident's room for 1 of 1 residents sampled for self-administration of medications (Resident #2). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 9/6/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Resident #2 had adequate hearing, clear speech, able to understand and make herself understood. Resident #2 required supervision and limited assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL). […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 21 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2025Standard1 finding
  • May 8, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jan 22, 2021Standard1 finding
  • May 18, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Apr 7, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 16, 2014Standard1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2013—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • May 24, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction