Norwich Sub-Acute and Nursing
Norwich, Connecticut · CCN 075079
21 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 74
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Southeastern Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 41 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Jun 4, 2026
158 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.33 | 3.56 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.69 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.6% | 35.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $47,483 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G417.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1460.9% | E14.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B313.0% | C14.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5851×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Norwich Sub-Acute and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 4, 2026
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the facility failed to ensure safe bed level care for a cognitively impaired resident who required the assistance of two staff for bed mobility. Specifically, staff performed a one person turn using an unsafe technique, which resulted in the resident sliding from the bed and sustaining an acute fracture of the right tibia. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 15, 2025
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident identified at risk for falls, to prevent a fall with injury. The failure resulted in a resident fall with laceration that required seven (7) stitches. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, generalized muscle weakness, and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 that indicated severe cognitive impairment, and required staff assistance for transfers. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 30, 2025
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred in accordance with physician orders and the plan of care to prevent a fall with injury. The failure resulted in an acute mildly displaced fracture of the distal aspect of the fibula. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) of the left lower extremity and anxiety. Physician orders dated 6/6/2025 directed mobility status was an assist of two persons with rolling walker, stand pivot only for transfers, and ambulation with therapy only. Nursing admission note dated 6/6/2025 identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 9, 2025
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure the resident was supervised outside of the facility leading to a fall with injury. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), anxiety disorder and personality disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13), required substantial assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 22, 2023
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, during a tour of the kitchen, the facility failed to store food according to professional standards. The findings include: Observation in the Dietary Department with the Food Service Manager on 3/15/23 at 9:50 AM identified the following items found in the walk- in refrigerator: 1.French dressing 1 Gal- noted to be open and with a received date of 9/15/22. The container lacked opened and expiration dates. 2. [NAME] Italian 1 Gal- noted to be open with approximately 1/8th of the contents missing, and with a received date of 3/9/23. The container lacked opened and expiration dates. 3. Sweet Relish- noted to be open with 1/2 of the contents missing, and with a received date of 2/10/23. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 74 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 4, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 30, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 9, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- May 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 22, 2023Complaint3 findings
- May 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 22, 2023Standard11 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Sep 16, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 10, 2021Complaint2 findings
- May 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 21, 2020Standard5 findings
- Jan 14, 2019Standard1 finding
- Nov 2, 2017Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jan 26, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 10, 2016Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jun 1, 2015Standard5 findings
- Apr 10, 2014Standard7 findings
- May 9, 2013—6 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—12 findings
- Mar 11, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Milford Health and Rehabilitation CenterMilford1 harm finding
- Civita Care Center at Long RidgeStamfordno harm findings
- Manchester Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterManchester1 harm finding
- Glastonbury Center for Health & RehabilitationGlastonburyno harm findings
- Westview Health Care CenterDayville1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction