Deficiency Index

Northwoods Lodge

Silverdale, Washington · CCN 505484

19 surveys since 2014. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
85
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2014–2026
’14’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
57
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SANTE
County
Kitsap
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Mar 16, 2026

238 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.483.93
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.23—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%43.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$51,942 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG38.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2466.7%E925.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 85 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Northwoods Lodge, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement measures to prevent development of avoidable pressure ulcers and to thoroughly assess, monitor and obtain timely treatment orders for pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 38) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 38 experienced harm when they developed two avoidable pressure ulcers which required hospitalization for surgical intervention and intravenous (in the vein) antibiotics. Findings included . Resident 38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of blastocystitis (an infection of the intestines caused by a parasite, may cause diarrhea), weakness, and polyneuropathy (damage to multiple nerves). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 27, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the assessed level of supervision required to ensure residents were free from avoidable accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. Additionally, the facility failed to document supervision for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm when they fell from bed and sustained a hip fracture, pain, and hospitalization . This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 28, 2024

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when a change of condition was not addressed timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) and when neurological (neuro) assessments were not consistently performed following unwitnessed falls for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for quality of care. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had to be emergently transferred to the hospital when they had a significant change in their baseline cognition and status following an unwitnessed fall. These failures placed residents at risk for medical complications, poor clinical outcomes, unmet care needs, pain, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 16, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdated food products were timely discarded, and to have a system in place that ensured sanitization of cookware, silverware, dishes, and food preparation areas. The facility's failed to timely discard outdated food products, to test the concentration of the sanitizer buckets when replaced, and to act when temperature testing of the facility's high temperature dishwasher (DW) showed it did not meet the minimum temperature required for sanitization. These failures prevented staff from ensuring food was prepared on sanitized surfaces, meals were served on sanitized dishes, residents did not consume outdated food products and placed resident at risk for food-borne illness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Mar 16, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident's representative and Ombudsman in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital, convey the required information to the hospital and provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 34, 68, 18 and 66 ) when reviewed for hospitalization. These failures placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their transfer, discharge rights and the right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 34 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included left calf ulcer, heart failure and… […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 85 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 16, 2026Standard8 findings
  • Jun 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2025Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 28, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Oct 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2020Standard9 findings
  • Feb 22, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Feb 7, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Mar 10, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Dec 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction