Deficiency Index

NHC Healthcare - Lexington

West Columbia, South Carolina · CCN 425333

8 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
26
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
170
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
County
Lexington
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.823.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover45.5%43.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ120.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD240.0%E240.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 26 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at NHC Healthcare - Lexington, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 12, 2025

    Based on record review, interview, observation and review of facility policy, (1) the facility failed to ensure an ordered medication was secured and not left at Resident (R)40's bedside. Additionally, (2) the facility failed to ensure the correct resident (R23) was transported to an appointment. Specifically, transportation picked up R130 (who did not have an appointment), a cognitively impaired and elopement risk resident, and transported her approximately 15 miles to a medical facility and left the resident unattended. For 3 of 5 residents reviewed. On 03/12/25 at 9:00 AM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 02/05/25. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Mar 12, 2025

    Based on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment (Bipap, CPAP, and Nebulizer Masks) were functioning, maintained, and stored appropriately for 4 of 4 residents (Resident (R)19, R14, R46 and R59) reviewed for respiratory care out of total sample of 12 residents. The facility's deficient practice increased the resident's risk of respiratory complications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, 306 Respiratory- Respiratory Therapy Equipment with a revision date of February 2025 revealed, 3. Respiratory equipment (i.e., nasal cannula, aerosols, etc.) at bedside will be covered with a plastic bag when not in use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was disposed of properly in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, used PPE was observed hanging outside of the resident's rooms who were currently on droplet precautions for 6 of 9 rooms observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, 704 Droplet Precautions, documented, Change protective attire and perform hand hygiene between contact with patients in the same room, regardless of whether one patient or both patients are on Droplet Precautions. Review of the CDC Infection Control Summary of Recommendations with a revision year of 2007, states, Slide 10. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Apr 2, 2026

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not pre-poured prior to administration for 3 of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Policy dated 01/01/26 revealed, Policy Statement: Medication shall be prepared and administered safely, accurately, and in accordance with physician orders, professional standards of nursing practice, and all applicable federal and state regulation. Medication Preparation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Mar 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within residents' reach and easily accessible for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, Resident (R)126 and R61. Findings include: Review of the facility policy with a revision date of October 2023, titled, Call Light documented, Purpose: To provide a means of communication of needs from the residents to the staff . 8. When providing care to residents be sure to position the call light conveniently for the resident to use. Tell the resident where the call light is and show him/her how to use the call light . 11. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 26 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2025Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 3, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Dec 11, 2017Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 30, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Feb 12, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Apr 18, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 20, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction