Deficiency Index

NHC Healthcare, Cookeville

Cookeville, Tennessee · CCN 445110

13 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
29
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
104
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
County
Putnam · rural
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 17, 2026

145 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.093.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.50—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%48.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD685.7%E—F114.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 29 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6891×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7561×

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at NHC Healthcare, Cookeville, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jun 17, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan intervention was in place after a fall for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, .[FACILITY NAME] FALLS PROGRAM . undated, revealed .Initiate a falls care plan .Implement appropriate interventions .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Difficulty in Walking, and History of Falling. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Feb 12, 2025

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) timely after a new mental health diagnosis for 3 residents (Residents #43, #47, and #69) of 11 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), revised on 11/2016, revealed .Center should refer any patient for Level II resident review upon a significant change in status/ condition such as newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Feb 12, 2025

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to hospice services for 1 resident (Resident #75) and for dental issues for 1 resident (Resident #85) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, SECTION VII: PATIENT CARE PLANS, dated 11/2023, revealed .services outlined in the comprehensive care plan meet .standards of quality .Problems are patient conditions .Care plans are updated as needed .New problems are handled as they arise .are to be added to the current care plan . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Feb 12, 2025

    Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store refrigerated food items for 1 Resident (Resident #5) of 19 residents observed for a homelike environment related to food storage. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stroke, Difficulty Swallowing, Kidney Disease, and Falls. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #5 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the annual MDS assessment revealed Resident #5 was able to feed herself with staff set up and staff clean up assistance. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Dec 15, 2021

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food was not expired. The facility failed to discard one bag of mild cheddar cheese. The facility census was 102. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on [DATE] at 10:55 AM, one bag, labeled mild cheddar cheese, revealed an opened date of [DATE] and an expiration date of [DATE]. During interview on [DATE] at 10:59 AM, the Dietary Director (DD) #1 confirmed the cheddar cheese had expired on [DATE] and should have been removed from the refrigerator and discarded. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 17, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Feb 12, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Dec 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Mar 15, 2017Standard1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Mar 9, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2014—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 22, 2011—4 findings
  • May 26, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction