Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Columbia

Columbia, Tennessee · CCN 445236

12 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
52
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
123
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Maury
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 13, 2026

180 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—
Annual nurse turnover51.3%48.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG333.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD444.4%E222.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 52 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Columbia, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 13, 2026

    Based on policy review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Enhanced Barrier Precautions, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the prevention and spread of infection during medication administration for 3 of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #5, and Resident #51) sampled residents. The findings: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 8/19/2025, revealed .The facility should use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).for residents with any of the following.wounds and /or indwelling medical devices.Indwelling medical device examples include.feeding tubes [a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications when oral… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686May 13, 2026

    Based on policy review, National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Position Statement review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a thorough assessment and documentation while receiving wound care treatments for 1 of 3 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Integrity and Pressure/Ulcer Injury Prevention, dated 6/11/2025, revealed .Provide associates and licensed nurses with procedures to manage skin integrity, prevent pressure ulcer/injury. Complete wound assessment/documentation, and provide treatment and care of skin and wounds.a skin assessment/inspection should be performed weekly by a nurse. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Dec 8, 2021

    Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician timely for 1 of 2 (Resident #96) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization s. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Changes in Resident's Condition of Status, dated 5/5/2020, revealed .To outline the actions required to address a change in resident's condition or status .This facility will notify the resident, his/her primary care provider, and resident/resident representative of changes in the resident's condition or status . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Dec 8, 2021

    Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to have a current Physician's Order for [CONDITION(S)] and failed to provide adequate services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #146) reviewed for [CONDITION(S)]. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, [CONDITION(S)], revised 11/12/2021, revealed .This facility assures that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis .consistent with professional standards of practice including .Ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after [CONDITION(S)] treatments .Ongoing communication and collaboration with the [CONDITION(S)] facility regarding [CONDITION(S)] care and services .Initiate the Pre/Post… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 52 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 13, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2018Standard3 findings · 3 harm
  • May 24, 2017Standard10 findings · 5 harm
  • May 17, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Apr 29, 2015Standard6 findings
  • May 7, 2014Complaint1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Oct 24, 2013—7 findings
  • May 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2011—8 findings
  • Jul 7, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction