New Hampton Nursing & Rehab Center
New Hampton, Iowa · CCN 165297
13 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 38
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- EDGEWOOD CONVALESCENT HOME
- County
- Chickasaw · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 10, 2025
668 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.32 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.06 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 27.6% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G120.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E120.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at New Hampton Nursing & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 10, 2025
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy/procedure review the facility failed to provide an environment free from physical assault and physical injury for 2 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 24 residents. Findings include: 1. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 10.24.24 indicated Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Cervical Spinal Fusion, Cervical Disc Disorder with Myopathy, malnutrition, Anemia, Heart Failure (HF), Coronary Artery Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation (AF). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 9, 2022
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately provide assessment and interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for anticoagulation (blood thinning medication) therapy. The facility failed to recognize that an international normalized ratio (INR, blood test to determine how long it takes to blood to clot) had not been done from the time of admission until 35 days later when the resident exhibited symptoms of having blood that was too thin. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Aug 4, 2022
Based on observation, interviews, and dryer manual review the facility failed to keep access panels to two (2) dryers closed when running the dryers to dry clothing and linens. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include During an observation on 08/03/22 at 08:45 AM of the facilities laundry room revealed two (2) dryers one (1) running with a very well contained orange fire inside the machines. The access panel open with the keys in the lock. During an interview on 08/03/22 at 08:45 AM with the Laundry Supervisor revealed the access panels to the dryers are closable by lock and key but the heat goes out when they are closed, so they are kept open for air flow. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jan 10, 2025
Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, Resident Council Minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner and within the required 15 minute time frame. (Resident #2, #4 and #5). The facility identified a census of 24 residents. Findings include: During an interview 1.9.25 at 4:05 p.m., Resident #4, identified by the facility as interviewable, indicated last night she timed her call light being on over one (1) hour as she used the clock on the wall in her room to watch the time which made her feel unwanted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 4, 2022
Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to keep the facilities oven and convection oven free of black and brown buildup. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include During an observation on 08/01/22 from 9:20-9:40 AM revealed the facilities kitchen oven with black build up noted to stove. The facilities convection oven also observed with black buildup and brown exterior buildup. During an interview on 08/01/22 from 9:20-9:40 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed she would like the ovens cleaner, but unable to with staffing levels right now. Record review of a undated kitchen cleaning policy, titled Cleaning of Kitchen Items documented the following instructions: a. Stove 1. Daily, wipe up any spills with warm soapy water. 2. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 38 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 10, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 9, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 4, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
- May 26, 2021Standard1 finding
- Sep 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 26, 2017Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Feb 12, 2015Standard2 findings
- Dec 5, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 24, 2013—2 findings
- Nov 15, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 28, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction