Maquoketa Care Center
Maquoketa, Iowa · CCN 165579
10 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 29
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SHLOMO HOFFMAN
- County
- Jackson · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2007
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 2, 2026
130 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.42 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.11 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,492 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G216.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D650.0% | E433.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F7252×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Maquoketa Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 2, 2026
Based on observation, clinical record review, document review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect and provide a safe environment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed from resident-to-resident abuse (Resident #32). On 6/14/26 at 7:44 AM Resident #42 walked from his dining room chair over to Resident #32 who sat in a Broda wheelchair (specialty wheelchair) and struck Resident #32 on the left side of the head with his cane. This deficient practice resulted in a 5 Centimeter (CM) bump with a 1 CM lesion to Resident #32's head and facial bruising. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. The concern was identified and corrected June 16, 2026 with an all staff huddle to provide resident safety education, prior to surveyor entrance on June 29, 2026. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 13, 2026
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and protect one of seven residents reviewed from resident to resident abuse (Resident #2). On 4/19/26, Resident #1 stood over Resident #2 while Resident #2 was in a reclined wheelchair, and Resident #1 hit Resident #2 in the face with the handle of his cane 3 to 4 times. This deficient practice resulted in a slightly swollen eye for Resident #2 with bruising to the left cheek under Resident #2's eye. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 2, 2026
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and infection-controlled environment to prevent the potential development and transmission of disease and pathogenic organisms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene protocols were executed during wound care dressing changes for 2 of 2 residents observed (#6 and #24); failed to utilize a gown as part of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 2 residents observed with indwelling medical devices (Resident #5); and failed to ensure medications were administered free from significant contamination and errors for 2 of 7 residents observed during oral medication administration passes (Resident #18 and Resident #43). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Dec 5, 2024
Based on record review, Facility Assessment review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to employ sufficient numbers of staff to meet resident needs, and failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1, Resident #3, and Anonymous). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility staff schedules from November 2nd through December 7th, 2024 revealed Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) were not present in the required ratios during the day shifts as follows: ~ Missing one CNA- 14 days ~ Missing two CNAs- 3 days In an interview on 12/02/24 at 1:12 PM a resident who wished to remain anonymous explained staff were not coming in often enough to toilet them. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Dec 5, 2024
Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to keep all medication locked in the medication cart as required. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: In an observation on 12/02/24 at 8:00 AM the bottom drawer of a medication cart in the back hall was found open with medications exposed. This surveyor was able to approach the cart and access medications in the drawer. No nurse or staff were visualized next to the cart or down the hallway. In an interview on 12/03/24 at 1:40 PM Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) explained the expectation for the medication cart was for it to be kept locked, the laptop screen to be locked out, and any personal health information to be covered when not directly at it. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 2, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- May 13, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 29, 2025Standard1 finding
- Dec 5, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Feb 28, 2022Standard1 finding
- Nov 15, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 10, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jul 21, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Jul 24, 2014Standard2 findings
- May 11, 2012—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction