Deficiency Index

Mt Healthy Christian Home

Cincinnati, Ohio · CCN 366025

9 surveys since 2014, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
19
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2014–2024
’14’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Hamilton
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 8, 2024

945 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.994.23
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—
Annual nurse turnover51.4%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG114.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD342.9%E228.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C114.3%
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 19 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mt Healthy Christian Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 8, 2024

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm to dependent Resident #20 when a staff member who was providing incontinence care to the resident without additional staff assistance turned away from the resident to discard cleaning materials and the resident fell from the bed. Resident #20 sustained the following injuries from the fall from the bed: a scalp laceration which required repair with sutures, a sternal fracture, a fracture of the left clavicle, a fracture of the second rib on the left side, a closed fracture of the spinous process of the thoracic vertebra and the transverse process of the lumbar vertebra. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 18, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of online resources per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect 13 (Residents #4, #7, #10, #20, #21, #25, #31, #32, #34, #41, #44, #53 and #54)residing on the Five South Unit; and failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal service. This affected three (Residents #3, #14 and #28) of 18 residents observed for meal service on the Four North Unit. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Oct 18, 2021

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident's wheelchair was equipped with a calf board and foot rests. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living assistance. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the minimum date set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers and locomotion. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF685Oct 18, 2021

    Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with placement of hearing aids. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for hearing impairment. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 08/24/21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADL). She had a communication impairment and required the use of bilateral hearing aids to hear adequately. […]

Read all 19 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 8, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 18, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Feb 21, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 14, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jan 25, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard2 findings
  • May 27, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • May 1, 2014Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction