Deficiency Index

Mount Saint Joseph Rehab Center

Euclid, Ohio · CCN 365487

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
58
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Cuyahoga
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 10, 2025

578 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.054.23
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover52.5%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG17.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD753.8%E—F215.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B17.7%C215.4%
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 58 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mount Saint Joseph Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF848Apr 10, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure its arbitration agreement contained all necessary information. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the facilities arbitration agreement revealed the agreement did not address the selection of a neutral arbitrator for the arbitration proceedings. Further review of the agreement also revealed it did not address the selection of a neutral venue for arbitration proceedings. The agreement noted Any arbitration conducted pursuant to Article IV (of the admission agreement) shall be conducted at the facility Interview with the Administrator on 04/09/25 at 3:30 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Apr 10, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up to a pharmacy recommendation for Resident #51 was completed as required. This affected one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, high cholesterol and insomnia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Oct 5, 2023

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of an elevated lab value for Resident #5. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of cervical vertebra, displaced fracture of clavicle, and osteoarthritis. The resident was discharged to the hospital on 08/27/23. Review of the Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severely impaired cognition. The resident required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, and toilet use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Oct 5, 2023

    Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure Resident #5 was adequately monitored after a change in condition. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of cervical vertebra, displaced fracture of clavicle, and osteoarthritis. The resident was discharged to the hospital on 08/27/23. Review of the Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severely impaired cognition. The resident required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, and toilet use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 11, 2023

    Based on a record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the state agency as required. This affected one (#60) of three residents (#5, #6, and #60) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to viral hepatitis C, seizures, major depressive disorder, personal history of sex reassignment. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/03/23, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 58 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 10, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Oct 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Aug 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Jul 26, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Oct 12, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 10, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jun 11, 2014Complaint8 findings
  • Jul 25, 2013—5 findings
  • May 31, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 14, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 14, 2011—2 findings
  • Apr 28, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction