Deficiency Index

Mountain City Rehab Center

Frostburg, Maryland · CCN 215277

18 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
167
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Allegany · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Mar 6, 2026

248 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.503.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.75—
Annual nurse turnover48.4%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$48,227 across 3 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.5%K—L—
Actual harmG23.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4772.3%E1320.0%F11.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.5%
CMS’s current file: 65 of the 167 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mountain City Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 26, 2024

    Based on review of facility reported incident investigation documents and medical records, interviews and observations it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a vulnerable resident from exiting the facility unattended by staff. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #234) out of 3 residents reviewed in relation to facility self reports of elopement during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #234's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2021 with multiple psychiatric diagnosis which included paranoid schizophrenia. In November 2022 the resident was receiving multiple psychoactive medications including an antipsychotic, an antidepressant and antianxiety medications. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 7, 2025

    Based on facility policy review, record review, facility document review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, which affected 4 (Resident #8, #7, #12, and #18) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents or falls during the complaint survey. Specifically, Resident #8 was improperly transferred by one staff when they required two staff to safely transfer causing actual harm. The Findings include: A facility policy titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes, revised 03/2018, revealed, The purposes of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall. The policy revealed, Preparation included, 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 26, 2024

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. This was found to be evident for one(Resident #34) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the survey. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm to Resident #34. The findings include 1.) On 11/13/24 review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident has resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnosis include but are not limited to, dementia, osteoporosis, high blood pressure, and hypothyroidism. The resident had two pressure ulcers, one on each foot, with orders for daily dressing changes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Nov 26, 2024

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information to Medicare. This was evident in the off-site preparation portion and during the on-site recertification survey. The findings include: During the off-site preparation for the recertification survey, the survey team was provided a copy of the facility's Payroll Based Journal Report which indicated that no data was submitted. On 11/12/24 at 9:31 AM during the entrance conference with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) the surveyor provided the [NAME] report and PBJ staffing Data Report which indicated that no data was submitted for the 3rd quarter which ended June 30, 2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Mar 6, 2026

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required information to the resident and their representatives at the time of discharge to the hospital; and failed to ensure required documents were sent with the resident to the hospital at the time of transfer. This was found to be evident for two (Resident #6 and #9) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization.The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was a long-term care resident who has resided at the facility for more than a year. On 2/23/26 the resident was transferred from the facility to the hospital, where the resident was admitted . […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 167 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 6, 2026Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Nov 7, 2025Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 26, 2024Standard and complaint37 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 20, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 9, 2018Standard and complaint22 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard and complaint24 findings
  • Apr 22, 2016Complaint4 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Sep 24, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jun 20, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Mar 18, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 28, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2013—14 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 11, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 18, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 20, 2012—4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2011—1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2010—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction