Deficiency Index

Montcare at Bethesda

Bethesda, Maryland · CCN 215095

33 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
190
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
1975

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Feb 25, 2026

257 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.323.55
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.79—
Annual nurse turnover35.8%43.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2175.0%E621.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 190 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Montcare at Bethesda, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Feb 25, 2026

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for all residents. This was evident to be true for 9 out of 44 resident rooms observed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During observational rounds and interview with staff #22 on 02/18/2026 at 7:45 AM the following observations were made: room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom sink hot water facet dial was broken off and missing with water running continuously.room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom wallpaper was torn, no towel rack, lightbulbs in light fixture were not working, and bathroom cove base was noted to be missing and or not in good repair.room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom had a brown color, resembling rust, substance found around the base of the toilet seal as well as on… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Nov 6, 2024

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to 1) notify the Ombudsman of a Resident's (Resident #23) transfer to an acute care facility and 2) notify the Resident (Resident #47) /Resident representative of transfer to an acute care facility in writing. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #23 & #47) out of 3 residents reviewed for transfers during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) During a review of Resident #23's medical record conducted on 11/01/2024 at 10:03 AM it was revealed that the resident was transferred to a Hospital emergency roiagnom on [DATE]. A review of the Ombudsman notification of transfers was conducted on 11/04/24 at approximately 9:00 AM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Nov 6, 2024

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (#47) out of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization s during the annual survey. The findings include: On 11/04/24 at 10:13 AM, a review of Resident #47's clinical record revealed that Resident #47 was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation of his/her medical needs on the following dates: 4/12/24 and 5/5/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to 1) maintain a safe and effective system for securing medication and 2) store medications properly. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 medication carts observed during the re-certification survey. The findings include: 1) During an interview conducted on 10/31/24 at 1:12 pm, Resident #85 gave this surveyor a set of keys on a lanyard that he/she stated were found on the hallway floor of the 1st floor nursing unit on the evening of 10/30/24. The Resident further stated that the keys belonged to the medication cart. An interview was conducted on 10/31/24 at 1:15 PM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the kitchen failed to store food items to maintain the integrity of the specific item. This was evident during multiple observations of the kitchen on a recertification survey. The findings include: On 10/28/24 at 9:32 AM surveyors conducted an initial tour of the kitchen. During the tour, surveyors identified 2 items within the food prep refrigerator that were improperly stored: - A bottle of Red Cooking Wine marked with an open date showing 8/15/24 and a dispose date of 9/15/24 - An opened 48 oz glass container of Concord Grape Jelly without any open date and dispose date. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 190 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 25, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Oct 10, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard13 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jan 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2018Standard and complaint25 findings
  • Jul 29, 2018Complaint2 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Feb 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2017Standard13 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jul 28, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jun 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jul 17, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 13, 2013—11 findings
  • Sep 9, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2012—20 findings
  • Aug 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2012—15 findings
  • Oct 31, 2011—1 finding
  • May 24, 2011—2 findings
  • Feb 28, 2011—21 findings
  • Jan 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2010—1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction