MN Veterans Home Silver Bay
Silver Bay, Minnesota · CCN 245628
10 surveys since 2015. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 28
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 54
- Ownership
- Government - Federal
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Lake · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2015
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.97 | 4.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.63 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G116.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D583.3% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at MN Veterans Home Silver Bay, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jan 15, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the correct resident for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors. This failure resulted in actual harm for R1 when she developed bradycardia (abnormally slow heart rate) and became hypotensive (abnormally low blood pressure) which required ongoing monitoring in the emergency department (ED). The facility had implemented appropriate corrective action prior to the onsite investigation, so the deficiency is being cited at past non-compliance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF563Feb 3, 2021
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to allow residents to receive visitors. This practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents who resided at the facility, and their families. Findings include: On 2/2/21, at 1:07 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated the facility had no residents or staff diagnosed with [REDACTED]. On 2/3/21, at 10:33 a.m. the DON stated the last facility resident tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/18/20, and the last staff-person tested positive on 1/4/21. On 2/3/21, at 10:53 a.m. the DON was interviewed and states she believed the facility was in crisis staffing. The DON stated under guidance, certain exceptions to visitation were allowed which included crisis staffing. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Apr 16, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications weren't left at a resident bedside when the resident was assessed to be unable to self-administer medications. This affected 1 of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include: R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R41 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included renal insufficiency, anxiety, and depression R41's Provider Order Summary Report undated, lacked orders to keep medications at bedside. R41's care plan undated, lacked information related to self-administration of medications. R41's Self Administration of Medications &/or Treatments (SAM) dated 3/20/26 indicated R41 did not want to self-administer medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 16, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff on resident physical abuse within two hours to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 4 residents (R54) reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Facility incident report dated 6/7/25, identified on the evening of 6/6/25 at approximately 8:00 p.m., R54 was handled roughly by a staff member, coming in contact with R54's left hand causing injury and pain.R54's progress note dated 6/6/25 at 10:39 p.m., identified staff called to room to assist with resident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Apr 16, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow provider orders and administer medications as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R41) reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R41 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included renal insufficiency, anxiety, and depressionR41's Provider Order Summary Report undated, identified an order for nicotine throat lozenge 4 milligrams (mg), give one lozenge by mouth every hour as needed.During an observation on 4/13/26 at 3:45 p.m., two white pills what R41 stated were nicotine throat lozenges were on the bedside table. During an observation on 4/14/26 at 11:10 a.m., R41 stopped registered nurse (RN)-A and requested two nicotine throat lozenges. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 28 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jan 15, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 3, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jul 9, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 28, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jun 14, 2018Standard3 findings
- May 11, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Apr 20, 2016Standard5 findings
- Oct 1, 2015Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction