Deficiency Index

Field Crest Care Center

Hayfield, Minnesota · CCN 245431

14 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
64
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
35
Ownership
Government - City
Chain
Independent
County
Dodge
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 19, 2026

263 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.294.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.71—
Annual nurse turnover36.8%32.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 64 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Field Crest Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was implemented to prevent the spread of Covid19 per guidance by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), when during a Covid19 outbreak, residents were observed not wearing masks. This had the potential to effect all 30 residents who resided in the facility. Further, the facility's failed to have an adequate water management program. The facility's water management program was incomplete and was not consistent with current ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Guideline, which specifically called for design and maintenance procedures for the potential exposure of Legionnaire's disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Feb 19, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen tank was handled safely for 1 of 1 resident (R24) reviewed for safety hazards.Findings include: R24's face sheet printed on 2/18/26, included diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease making it difficult to breathe).R24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R24 required supervision or partial assistance with activities of daily living. R24 used oxygen. R24's physician orders dated 2/4/26, indicated room air - 2 lpm (liters per minute) oxygen via NC (nasal cannula) with exercise/activity to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 88%. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Dec 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure required and accurate nursing staffing information was posted for residents and visitors. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility and their visitors. Findings include: The nursing staffing posting was observed in an acrylic wall pocket between resident hallways and near the dining room. The document was titled Today's Staffing and indicated the following: --Name of facility --Department of Nursing --Date --Census --Shift start times --Number of RN (registered nurse) hours and FTE's (full time equivalents) for the day, evening, and night shifts. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 64 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 19, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Sep 24, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 15, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jan 24, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Feb 18, 2016Standard10 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Apr 24, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard4 findings
  • May 16, 2013—4 findings
  • Mar 27, 2013—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 29, 2012—7 findings
  • Aug 26, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction