Deficiency Index

Mission Pines Nursing and Rehab Center

North las Vegas, Nevada · CCN 29E037

28 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
176
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
240
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Clark
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 21 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Nevada.

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2026

144 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.043.51
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.32—
Annual nurse turnover52.6%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2284.6%E27.7%F27.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 176 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mission Pines Nursing and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF644Oct 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a process in place to identify and refer residents for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) level two for 15 of 15 sampled residents (Residents 4, 8, 30, 31, 42, 61, 70, 91, 94, 96, 99, 106 112, 150, and 172) with psychiatric diagnoses. The deficient practice had the potential to deprive residents of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: The Intervention and Monitoring Behavioral Assessment policy revised March 2019, documented all residents would receive a Level one PASARR screening prior to admission. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) kitchen equipment was cleaned, 2) food items were labeled with dates in the dried food storage, 3) expired food was discarded, 4) pans were not stacked wet, and 5) two of two nourishment room's equipment and surfaces were routinely cleaned, was free of personal items, documented freezer temperature logs, and meal products were labeled and dated. The deficient practice had the potential to serve foods to residents at an increased risk of food safety. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Nov 8, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary personnel to ensure timely meal service and consistent cleaning of the kitchen. Failure to provide sufficient staff had the potential to adversely impact all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1) Timely meal service: On 11/03/22 at 08:05 AM, a meal service tray line was underway with the following staff on hand: One cook, two dietary aides, the Registered Dietitian (RD), and the Staffing Coordinator. Food in the steamtable included scrambled eggs, cinnamon rolls, sausage patties, pureed sausages, cinnamon rolls, and gravy. The staff in the kitchen worked rapidly as if rushed or hurried. The cook was dishing up the plates. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Nov 8, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for three of 35 sampled residents (Resident #35, #91, and #105) and seven unsampled residents. The failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Failure to serve palatable food at an appetizing temperature could adversely affect each resident's quality of life and their nutritional status. Findings include: 1) Tough, dry chicken: The 11/01/2022 the menu indicated the lunch entree was encrusted pork loin. On 11/01/2022, at 1:00 PM, there were twenty-five residents seated at tables in the North dining room. About half of the residents in the North dining room were served a chicken fillet entree, and the other half received a pork entree. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 8, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food from a sanitary environment. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Failure to keep the kitchen clean and sanitary had the potential to spread food-borne disease or attract pests. Findings include: During an inspection on 11/01/22 at 8:30 AM, with the Regional Dietary Director, the kitchen floor was covered with scattered debris and patchy discoloration consistent with a buildup of grime. The floor area under the dish machine had the greatest extent of buildup of debris and grime. The Regional Dietary Director verbalized the floor needed a deep cleaning. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 176 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 7, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Nov 8, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Oct 13, 2023Standard11 findings
  • Jul 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Jun 17, 2022Complaint3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2022Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 10, 2021Complaint7 findings
  • Jan 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2020Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Nov 14, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2019Standard17 findings
  • Jan 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2018Standard25 findings
  • Aug 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jul 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jul 31, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Aug 22, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Mar 7, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2013—8 findings
  • Sep 14, 2012Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2011—10 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction