Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute
Sacramento, California · CCN 055493
54 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 148
- Surveys
- 54
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Sacramento
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.07 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.1% | 37.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3254.2% | E2237.3% | F23.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.7% | C11.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 14, 2023
46995 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15) when Resident 15 did not receive preventative treatment (low air loss mattress- a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a large surface, used to help prevent skin breakdown) to prevent pressure ulcer (PU-injury to the skin and underlying tissue from prolonged pressure on the skin). This failure resulted in Resident 15 developing a Stage 4 (full thickness skin loss, wound can extend to muscle and bone) pressure ulcer to her sacrococcyx area (tailbone area). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 26, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance for one resident (Resident 1), who required two-person assistance for bed mobility, for a census of 85. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having an avoidable fall with injury, a left femur (thigh bone) fracture. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's medical records, the medical records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2018, with diagnoses that included functional [CONDITION(S)] (inability to move with or without spinal damage) and [CONDITION(S)] (inability of a person to communicate effectively with others due to damage in a specific area of the brain). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 7, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures for the prevention of pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when, Resident 1 developed a stage 3 pressure ulcer (an ulcer that has extended through dermis [second layer of skin] into the fatty subcutaneous [below the skin] tissues) on her coccyx (tailbone). This failure resulted in Resident 1 acquiring a preventable pressure ulcer and a delay in recovery. Findings: According to the Resident Face Sheet, Resident 1 was admitted in early March 2022 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 18, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise and prevent abuse for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 2 sexually abused Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause physical harm and emotional distress to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 9/15/20, documented her BIMS (a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score was 0 which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Jan 12, 2024
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' shower room on the second-floor was sanitary. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide residents with a sanitary bathroom and a homelike environment for a census of 35. Findings: During an observation on 1/12/24 at 10:06 a.m., in the shower room on the second-floor, the following was observed: Black and brown colored substance around the shower drain. Black and brown colored substances in the grout between tiles on the floor and walls. Missing grout in between tiles. Cracked, broken and missing tiles. During an interview on 1/12/24 at 10:14 a.m. with Resident 3, when asked about the cleanliness of the second-floor shower room, Resident 3 stated, It's disgusting. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 148 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 14, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 4, 2025Standard11 findings
- Nov 7, 2024Standard9 findings
Show the 46 earlier surveys
- Oct 25, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2023Standard21 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Jun 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 26, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 11, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Sep 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 7, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 18, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 31, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Aug 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 10, 2021Standard11 findings
- Jun 4, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Feb 23, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Nov 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2019Standard14 findings
- Aug 23, 2018Standard7 findings
- Jul 3, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Sep 15, 2017Standard3 findings
- Mar 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 9, 2016Standard3 findings
- May 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2015Standard1 finding
- Oct 9, 2014Standard3 findings
- Sep 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2013—2 findings
- May 20, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 30, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—5 findings
- Aug 12, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction