Deficiency Index

Citrus Grove Post Acute

Riverside, California · CCN 056315

95 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
275
Surveys
95
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file74/95

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
WINDSOR
County
Riverside
Medicare-certified since
1971

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.874.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.29—
Annual nurse turnover39.8%37.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4368.3%E1625.4%F23.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B23.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 63 of the 275 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8805×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5583×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Citrus Grove Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Apr 5, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy for smoking for 13 of 14 residents who smoke. This failure resulted in Residents 1 & 2 receiving cigarette burns resulting in treatment and had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of the facility's 14 vulnerable smokers resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation. On December 19, 2022, at 6:20 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-a crisis in which the health and safety of individuals are at risk) was identified and called in the presence of the Administrator (ADM) due to lack of supervision and safety measures per the facility's policy to ensure the safety of the facility's smokers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 16, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards for one of 19 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards, when the staff transferred Resident 1 using a torn sling (a tightly woven fabric that is placed under and around the resident) with the mechanical lift (a battery powered lift that utilizes a sling with loops that attach to the lift to transfer the resident). This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling from the lift and sustaining a femoral (thigh bone) fracture (broken bone) which required Resident 1 to be transferred to the acute hospital for medical treatment. Findings: Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 11, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to safely and effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when one dietary staff did not perform testing of the sanitizing solution in accordance with the manufacturer instructions.This failure had the potential to result in kitchen equipment used for food preparation and service being maintained outside required chemical parameters, increasing the risk for cross-contamination. Findings:On December 10, 2025, at 8:09 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the Dietary Aide (DA). The DA was asked to demonstrate the sanitation testing process using the Quaternary (sanitation solution) test paper. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 12, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The ice machine was dirty. 2. The two compartment prep sink did not have an air gap. 3. Dust found on the following areas: a) Silver storage shelves stored clean kitchen wares in juice area. b) Door stopper in juice area. c) Walk in refrigerator: Green color food storage shelves; wall, above door; copper pipe behind ventilator, black pipe behind ventilator. d) Silver storage shelves stored clean kitchen wares next to stove. e) Cart stored clean kitchen wares. f) Under steam table where stored clean serving pans. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF687Jul 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, for two of four residents reviewed for foot care (Residents 1 and 2), to ensure:1. For Resident 1, the facility arranged and completed a follow-up consultation with the podiatrist, as the resident was last seen on September 5, 2025; and2. For Resident 2, the facility arranged follow-up with the podiatrist and appropriately addressed the resident's repeated refusals of podiatry care since October 2024. Additionally, the facility did not initiate or develop a care plan to address Resident 1's multiple refusals of podiatry care.These failures resulted in Residents 1 and 2 going on an extended period without having their toenails clipped and/or monitored, resulting in untrimmed toenails and increasing their risk of… […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 275 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 4, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 31, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 11, 2025Standard9 findings
Show the 87 earlier surveys
  • Aug 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 17, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Jul 23, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2023Standard14 findings
  • Jun 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 16, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 15, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2022Complaint6 findings
  • Nov 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • May 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 1, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 28, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 6, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 25, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Oct 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 21, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Sep 25, 2018Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 12, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Aug 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Apr 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Oct 4, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 2, 2015Standard13 findings
  • Oct 7, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2014Standard15 findings
  • Sep 3, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 24, 2013—14 findings
  • May 17, 2013—1 finding
  • May 2, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 22, 2013—3 findings
  • Nov 5, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2012—7 findings
  • Jun 18, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 7, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction